Just like it says on the tin. On the bench against the barbarians. So no cap yet but he may come on. Live on Sky right now.

I was under the impression that he wasnt making it. This suggests otherwise

Great try from Eastmond

Typical scores with his first touch of the ball

Can somebody tell me what time Eastmond comes on at? I don't want to sit through the rest of this crap.

He comes on at about 50 mins biut he does nothing till 55 mins when he scores

Bringing a bit of rl to ru. Misses a conversion from under the sticks

And there should die the rumours of him making a league return. An England RU international will be out of the price range of pretty much any RL team outside of the NRL

In rugby union playing for the best international teams in the world is considered failure, especially if you're a league convert.

Wasn't that something more like England reserves? What a waste of an RL talent. If I were an RU coach looking for RL players, I'd focus more on those with games that may benefit RU rather than just because they're stars in RL. RL clubs used to do exactly the same in reverse at times - I assume some of you are old enough to remember that massive tub of lard prop you got from Wales (Stuart something?) and a just-as-useless roly-poly winger (Carrington?)?

I still have nightmares about Dai Young and John Gallagher before anyone starts....

Evans was a near unstoppable monster on the half-dozen or so times he managed to make it onto the pitch vaguely in shape during his career. I always said he could have been one of the all-time greats with even a little bit of professionalism and a decent fitness regime. You can have Carrington though - he was pretty much the poster boy for our disastrous signings of the late '80s. We paid out a shedload for him and if memory serves got 3 sub appearances and a disastrous start in a 0-36 home defeat in the Lancashire Cup against Oldham out of him in 2 years before he retired with injury... Meanwhile we turned down David Bishop because we were worried he'd get injured...

Memories... I think all the ankle-biter knee-jerk whiners on here need to go back in time 25 years or so and be made to support Saints then - then they'd see what a club run by unambitious amateur clueless fools actually looked like...

Does that including signing Dave Tanner when we went to watch Mark Preston?

And signing Adamson thinking he was his brother. Those were the days. Sad-End would have had 7 or 8 clueless idiots to pick from then.

Not to mention Bryan Henare, Ricky Cowan and Mark Bourneville.

Those were the days and one of the only reasons I can smile through our current predicament.

That story was nonsense. Phil Adamson was a well known and highly rated ARL player when we signed him. Like Josh Perry, he should have been a good signing. It just didn't work out for whatever reason.

A representative was sent to Australia to sign 'Adamson who played for Australia'. We signed Phil when we should have signed Matt. Was a state of Origin rep but still a cock-up.

Yeah, I know that's the story. It's just completely implausible. A classic 'made up' rumour that got repeated enough times to become 'true'.

There was only one reason Adamson didn't work out - Ellery Hanley.

Adamson was signed before Hanley was announced as coach, so obviously a move by the board. The way he was treated was quitre clearly Hanley flexing his muscles by banishing him to the reserves.

I remember us going to a number of reserve games that year and Adamson was quite clearly a man amongst boys, but Hanley left him in there for the entire year, despite the atrociously bad Paul Davidson playing a large number of game at prop for us that year.

Hanley may have won the league that year, but he was as mad as a sack of badgers.Just because Adamson didn't figure in his plans doesn't mean he couldn't have been good for us.

Another myth unfortunately - we knew exactly what we were getting when we signed Tanner. He always looked a very good player at #1 but unfortunately always had Vievers in his way and so ended up spending most of his Saints career being not quick enough stuck out on the wing. A crying shame.

And we [iactually[/i had Mark Preston play for us as a triallist in a reserves game and turned him down for being too small. He then went to Wigan and scored 45 tries in his first season. We spent a fortune on signing the colossus that was Brimah Kebbie instead, who I doubt scored 45 tries in his entire career... Numpties doesn't even begin to describe our management back then.

Yet some would suggest that this attitude is what is required today at Saints with regards to Lance. I've heard a few times, drop him to the reserves or send him to rochdale, to force him out.

Hanley was ruthless, but my point was that the Adamson thing wasn't based on his playing or training ability, more Hanley demonstrating his power over the players.
He tried the same thing with Tommy Martyn the season later and we know how that ended.

We looked at Offiah before Widnes signed him by all accounts,but the board said he was an uncordinated clown.Jerremy Guscott in his autobiography mentioned he met Saints directors and described them as a bunch of amatuers ( or something along those lines )

Yeah, but Guscott would probably have described himself as "amateur" at the time, and that would be rollocks.

Watched the Jonathon Davies super league supermen yesterday,he said he had talks with Saints in the garage of one of the directors,didnt sound very impressed with the way we handled it at all.

Those of us who remember our Dentist Director signing Aidrian Shelford on the back of a fag packet could understand it

Good god this board is totally sane compared to red vee admin and his merry men