If true then, yes, it would be concerning. However, you could easily be putting two and two together on this one and coming up with five. Radford may have decided that after two defeats he was going to try something different and start Pritchard rather than use him off the bench. It could be that simple.

Wasn't it Elis and Pritchard who led the team head banging session after the Widnes thrashing?

I can’t see the above being true, if this not unusual drivel from you is true.

Will you stop eating those silly mushrooms?

didnt think i would ever agree with you but on this one YES

You did boo Steven Kearney didn't you ?

If It was true, he would have stood down from all club duties, I watched him give a very good speech before the Wigan game, which he seemed in great spirt and spoke very positive about the club, didn't look or sound like a man who had a fallout with the boss or club.

Fair enough. I know we all get told stuff, some true, some not so, just thought id share

I also got told were after Travis Burns!

dunno about frank but someone's had a few

Didn't we have a similar story about Shaul before? He seems to have come through OK tbh.

Then your been lied to.

You won't have any quota space for burns will you

We have zero cap left anyways..
We were massively over the cap hence why Westerman was in the pipeline to be sold all along to get us under. That we subsequently couldn't get even a desperate Lee Smith in the squad whom Radford really wanted backs that up so we are signing no-oneof note barring two, three or more squad players being let on season long loan

This rumour went round the pub on the night of the Wigan game and then in the ground.

Psssttttt......don't tell anyone but Pritchard is on 360k a season.

Wonder why he didn't go to the Warriors!

Are the south sea islanders getting a little bit too clingy together?

He is over a 5th of our cap, I know Bulldogs are paying some of his wages this year, but he won't be anywhere near that?

Also you are saying that there are group of players who like to hand around with each other outside of work, wonder if this ever happens at any other clubs?

1) rubbish
2) rubbish
3) Rubbish

Didn't our owner say pritchard was the highest paid player in SL? tomkins supposedly on £350k

No he stated they were the only 2 players used on the new "Marquee' rule.

Doesn't state salary

.... and a Sporting Life article says the only one is Tomkins. www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... -be-lifted ...and the rfl says... Quote The identity of any Marquee Player shall not be kept confidential.'"

.... and a Sporting Life article says the only one is Tomkins. www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... -be-lifted ...and the rfl says... Quote The identity of any Marquee Player shall not be kept confidential.'"

wire have played a blinder getting sandow for less than £175k a season then

There has always been the option to pay players more than £175k, as long as the total limit of £1,825,000 isn't exceeded.

Indeed, but with wire's available pot of money I doubt they wouldn't make use of the marquee player rule if they were paying someone over £175k

Pearson said before a game last year on Humberside that Pritchard would be the highest paid player in the league.

I thought he had. Presumably he's still getting a chunk from the doggies

My guess would be that with the Bulldogs paying part of his salary, Hull have front loaded his contract