Quote ="Jake the Peg"Not a wind up, but my opinion. cooke was a very important player for us and has been badly missed since, however, swain carried that team and created the go forward that players like cooke needed. It's no coincidence that cooke's career went down the pan when he didn't have that calibre of hooker to play off for the rest of his career.'"
Can see we're your coming from but think Cooke's personal issues and the pressure of the move are why his career went down the pan.
It sounds like I'm underating Swain here, which I'm not but for a hooker to have that kind of influence he'd have probabally had to have been the greatest of all time, Cooke could find that cut out pass as good as anyone I've seen, sure speed of distribution from DH would have helped but he'd still have that ability even if someone else was at dummy half, It would be like saying the likes of Cronk, Slater, Inglis would not be good at what they do without Cam Smith, for me it's just top players working well together, in the same way that Swain, Cooke and Horne worked well together in that period, Cooke's contribution to that side was never replaced.
Like I say Swain was a top player, was adored at Melbourne too, but I think most would agree that his influence was down to his defence, leadership and reading of the game, rather then a direct attacking influence, I'd even say in that sense, a fully fit Richard Horne was more influential to our attack.