i think the washbrook decision was wrong, never took his eye off the ball. shame for hull, but they couldn't get any decent possession in the second half.all credit to saints to come from 18 down.its been mentioned about long and phelps missing, but i think radford will improve the side when back. think hull when they do learn to catch the ball and not let it bounce need to return the ball at pace, kick returns seem to be very slow.
all in all disapointed that hull didn't get the 2 points today, think ganson was wrong to award the penalty at the end. but 5 points from 6 over the easter period is a great return considering who we have played.
Quote="Standee"The RFL could quite easily stop the conspiracy theories y simply not letting Ganson referee Saints.
But then they're not exactly an intelligent bunch at times.'"
IIRC the history behind this was that Ganson was the top rated ref at the time Saints were getting to all the finals and so he wasn't getting to ref the big games that his 'status' would normally have guaranteed. He complained about it (I seem to recall he might even have threatened to resign) and the RFL caved. Unlikely they'll go back on that decision now.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
