i think he will get at least 10 games, even if we get heavy defeat today.

If you want to look at everything cynically, then fair enough. I can't argue against that.

I don't see many squad issues Agar has created, the squad's there. Whether he can get the best from it remains to be seen.

Sean Long signed on a 2 year deal.
Richard Horne given a new 3 year contract.
Danny Washbrook given a new 3 year contract
Failure to effectively replace Paul Cooke despite having 3(!) off-seasons to do so.
Lee Radford given a new 2(!) year deal.
Ewan Dowes given a new one year deal.
Peter Cusack's contract extension.
Beginning the 2011 season with only one recognised centre in the squad.
Stockpiling second rowers.
Using quota spots on Moa and Lauaki and then barely using them.

And those are just the ones that aren't debatable.

Was by far the best available given what the team needed at the time. Hasn't worked out well, not Agar's fault.

I think at the time the club rewarded him on his service. Not too bad a thing considering 50% of his salary doesn't count towards the cap.

On the back of a very good 2008 where he got into a number of coaches dream team, including Morgans.

I am in no doubt that Tansey and Nicklas were our back ups, the situation surrounding those 2 was far from Agar's fault.

Under rated is Radders, his deal has been reduced, so no problem for me especially at prop.

As a 5th prop, I certainly don't think Dowes is the worst.

Mmm, hard to argue with that one. Was more to sweeten the Fitz deal methinks.

Yeaman, Whiting, Turner has played most of his SL career there, then there's Briscoe.

Luauki is now a prop, as should Fitz be. So that leaves Tickle, Manu and Westerman(who's a 13).

They're not wastes if used correctly, and i've previously stated that Agar's bench baffles me.

You are extremely hard work East Hull but I'm starting to like you

Edited for accuracy.