I agree...you were sh[ii[/ite

Both.

So then we were in the gave for five minutes. Whoopee!

Like I said you were only 6 points behind in the 50th minute so it's safe to say you were still in the game at that point, so over half the game.

No. We had been 18 points down previously. We were in the game for the time we were within six points ... which was approximately five minutes.

Like I said ... whoopee.

The score in the 50th minute was 12-6, so where you get 18 points behind is anybody's guess.

No idea. Who gives a $hit anyway? I don't. You're a real saddo with your obsession. But whatever floats your boat.

I'll just remind you of the game you lost at home against the Dragons. Where are you now in the league table?

We lost. Get over it. I have!

That's not very lady like.

Can somebody over that side of the Pennines please pick StainsFan dummy up please. No wait, it's made it's way over to here.

I've not spat anything out. We lost. We were never in the game. You're weird.

You obviously do as you were on here like a tramp on a kebab, even whilst your team were still getting a good pumping.

Apart from that huge dummy spit ranting on about obsessions, our lost to Catalan and other irrelevant things, no. Who'd have thought saying you were in the game until the 50th minute would cause you such angst?

I got back from being out and it was 12-6 to Hudds. Since when did any self-respecting Stains fan consider one try to be too much to recover from?

Hell, even Eddie thought they would come back from back from 32-6

Don't you know 12-6 means they were 18 points behind just before Stains scored. No wonder StainsFan is angry.

I'm very surprised at your post Ted, I thought you were better than that. I will certainley listen out for your comments on air in the future.

Er, you don't know about modern technology then? Ok.

Your phrasing is lovely. Does you credit, btw.

I'm not angry.

I got mixed up with the game against Hull, when we went 18 points behind. Although we were very definitely in THAT game.

I've been expecting this loss for about two weeks. Losses happen. Everyone moves on.

But you're still weird.

Eddie bugged me with his comments against Brown around the Saint's try at about 70 mins (I can't remember who scored but he did his shoulder). Eddie claiming that Brown when high and needs to cut it out of his game, he just about hit the top of the try scorer's head when his head was waist high.

Ah, the old..."I have an iphone and I'm really at the match" chestnut.

I never said you didn't go to the game (couldn't care less), I stated you were browsing the Wigan board whilst your team were still playing around the 70th minute onwards.

In fact if you DID go to the game then it's even worse.

I'd say:
1. confusing a game you've just watched with one played two weeks ago
2. going on about obsessions
3. our loss to Catalan and;
4. not giving a ""

just because I said you were in the game is getting angry. Dummy spit material some might say.

I'd say little of both but full credit to hudds they can only play what's infront of them and at times ripped us apart.

The effort was there from saints today but the last 6/7 weeks looks to be taking it's toll now. Some players like Sia, Graham, roby, magennis have been putting in big stints for couple of month now and looking very tired.

Nobody at saints are making excuses. It's rugby and players get hurt. I just hope that come July we will have a full healthy fresh squad for the business end of the year.

We may have had ten players out today(I'm not sure) but all ten obviously couldn't have played. That's just petty and silly to suggest that.

Off the top of my head, from the ten or so players we had out I'd say wheeler, Pryce, lomax, Tony p, flannery, clough and Moore would have most prob made our 17 today and maybe eastomond.

So in all fairness to hudds, we may have had ten players out but we only had seven or eight first team regulars out injured.

Who would have missed out for the 7 or 8 you had missing?

Just like we had, when we beat them.