|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 7027 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="Cokey":2mha8dy8]Is ok good enough Col?[/quote:2mha8dy8]
Well I’ve been a fan for far more years than I wish to remember and I never thought I’d see the likes of 1982 again or even close, but these last 2 seasons have been unreal, not just on the pitch but the fan growth, the academy granted, move to leopards an image and marketing masterstroke that the majority of us scoffed at
I’ll say that I did us a disservice by saying ok - but 6th then 4th is a pretty big step in a short period of time
Out of interest what would you expect us to achieve beyond where we are now
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 22020 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="ColD":zj6jht3j]Well I’ve been a fan for far more years than I wish to remember and I never thought I’d see the likes of 1982 again or even close, but these last 2 seasons have been unreal, not just on the pitch but the fan growth, the academy granted, move to leopards an image and marketing masterstroke that the majority of us scoffed at
I’ll say that I did us a disservice by saying ok - but 6th then 4th is a pretty big step in a short period of time
Out of interest what would you expect us to achieve beyond where we are now[/quote:zj6jht3j]
Well Degsey feels we can beat Wigan in the 1st game, & he believes we can win the C Cup; That's not to mention finishing in the top 4 & getting to Old Trafford. These are aspirations we should believe we can achieve, and I believe we can achieve them. Glass half full me Col.
BTW - Sneyd won't be coming to Leigh, so unless we get a top quality half, we will have to go with O'Brien, and Ben Mac. I just hope we're not going to be affected, and play catch up like last year. Moylan turned our season around somewhat starting at Hull, so I would prefer us to get a top quality half sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 659 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/ma ... -half-back
Leigh are now out of the running for Marc Sneyd, having tried to poach him before the warm weather training in Lanzarote. Salford have dragged their feet for 2 months now, without actually selling any players. The plan seems to be recoup some money from actually sales, at a time when 99.9% of players are sold/leave without a buyers fee. Derek has also done an interview in which he talks about the similar position Leigh found themselves in back in 2018. It would appear that Warrington provided a cash injection buying two players and the rest of the squad were moved on to reduce the salary cap. Reading between the lines, cash strapped Salford want income and a reduction in salary cap at the same time, all from a weak sellers position.
Leigh are going to start the season with Gaz O'Brien, with Ben McNamara as backup. Derek is keeping a chunk of change if needed for mid-season transactions.
Sneyd would have been a great addition to the Leopards, but he does not fit the current model for youth, speed and x-factor, although the last one he has in spades.
Salford appear to be wading further into the mire. The Forty20 podcast suggested that Salford have an historic debt of around £5M and most of that is with Salford City Council, who are also the landlords of the Salford Community Stadium. No amount of selling warm beer and sausage rolls is going to eat into a debt that huge. The £500K advance will get Salford to the starting line in 3 weeks time but sales of players would have allowed that money to stretch further. They are delaying and holding out for a buy out, but that will not shift the £5M in outstanding debts.
Today's meeting will no doubt allow for dispensation on the overseas cap, but it is doubtful that an increase in salary cap will be approved. Increasing the salary cap would skew the competition towards the teams with rich benefactors and sends a bad message at a time when all clubs are loss making.
|
|
https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/ma ... -half-back
Leigh are now out of the running for Marc Sneyd, having tried to poach him before the warm weather training in Lanzarote. Salford have dragged their feet for 2 months now, without actually selling any players. The plan seems to be recoup some money from actually sales, at a time when 99.9% of players are sold/leave without a buyers fee. Derek has also done an interview in which he talks about the similar position Leigh found themselves in back in 2018. It would appear that Warrington provided a cash injection buying two players and the rest of the squad were moved on to reduce the salary cap. Reading between the lines, cash strapped Salford want income and a reduction in salary cap at the same time, all from a weak sellers position.
Leigh are going to start the season with Gaz O'Brien, with Ben McNamara as backup. Derek is keeping a chunk of change if needed for mid-season transactions.
Sneyd would have been a great addition to the Leopards, but he does not fit the current model for youth, speed and x-factor, although the last one he has in spades.
Salford appear to be wading further into the mire. The Forty20 podcast suggested that Salford have an historic debt of around £5M and most of that is with Salford City Council, who are also the landlords of the Salford Community Stadium. No amount of selling warm beer and sausage rolls is going to eat into a debt that huge. The £500K advance will get Salford to the starting line in 3 weeks time but sales of players would have allowed that money to stretch further. They are delaying and holding out for a buy out, but that will not shift the £5M in outstanding debts.
Today's meeting will no doubt allow for dispensation on the overseas cap, but it is doubtful that an increase in salary cap will be approved. Increasing the salary cap would skew the competition towards the teams with rich benefactors and sends a bad message at a time when all clubs are loss making.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 659 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/ru ... s-30881591
RFL Commercial demand £800K cuts immediately. Salford wave two fingers up at them for 2 months and then spend some more money.
No announcement of a takeover yet, and RFL Commercial will not ratify any new signings until they hit £1.2M salary cap. Good luck getting this signing ratified.
|
|
https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/ru ... s-30881591
RFL Commercial demand £800K cuts immediately. Salford wave two fingers up at them for 2 months and then spend some more money.
No announcement of a takeover yet, and RFL Commercial will not ratify any new signings until they hit £1.2M salary cap. Good luck getting this signing ratified.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3405 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2015 | 10 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Sep, good evening.
Seeing garbled reports from Hull Live and Matthew Shaw elsewhere. Has "open season" reopened on Salford players?
Does the directive merely relate to quota players or is a move for a Fed player now re-allowed if cap space is available?
Before both the '23 & '24 seasons, Bongser asked, "who the 'eck is going to kick the points". Wysiwyg won the race this pre-season, but the query is iterated from this quarter.
Everyone knows which player Bongser would like to see donning the "lipstick" (that for Reffy) next season; and most would agree!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 659 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Honestly I thought Darnell looked quite good - then they took it off him and gave it to Moylan and Zak, go figure. I would love Sneyd to be kicking our goals, it would be like having Inu again kicking 10 from 10. No need to watch each kick with bated breath.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3405 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2015 | 10 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="Septimius Severus":35q61j46].......it would be like having Inu again kicking 10 from 10. No need to watch each kick with bated breath.[/quote:35q61j46]
Krisnan missed one (probably the first in twelve) from close to the touchline. Bongser, not far away, informed him that he was a "crud" kicker (or similar). Inu glared across to see a cheesy grin and saw the irony. Just as well, at B's age he didn't fancy Kris doing a Drummond and clobbering a spectator!
Yes, Bongser values kickers and, just in case folk think that that is because he was one; he has the same 100% ratio as Moimoi - one from one!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 659 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
How did Salford Red Devils get in this mess?
In April 2023 Salford Red Devils launched a community share scheme entitled “Reds Rise Together.” The aim was to raise between £250K - £2M to secure the long-term future of the club. Along with raising of capital, there were a number of commercial targets, like growing average attendances by 2000, securing income streams on matchdays and securing a long-term lease with money through refreshment sales.
SRD Holdings LTD Profit & Loss
Actual 2021 Actual 2022 Estimated 2023 Estimated 2024 Estimated 2025
Total Income 2612209 3154036 3469440 3900613 4321405
Total Expenditure 2961643 3734884 3873761 4395060 4511381
Profit/Loss Before Tax (349434) (580848) (404321) (494447) (189976)
The aim was to reduce the £580K loss in 2022 to a more manageable £189K loss in 2025 and break even some time in the near future. According to ChatGPT SRD were able to raise an incredible £1.5M, more conventional search engines put the figure at over £250K on the 30th May 2023.
The rest of the prospectus appears to have been less successful. Objective 3: To increase average match attendance by 2000 within 3 years. This in reality requires Salford to achieve average attendances of 6000 in 2025. The average figure in a successful season like 2024 was only 4646 way below the projected figure. This greatly impacts on the estimated income of nearly £4M which also incorporates the projected income stream for refreshments, which incidentally has still not been negotiated with Salford City Council, even though the season starts in just over two weeks time.
Salford City Council have periodically propped up the club with loans and grants to cover shortfalls in the SRD coffers. ChatGPT states that, “As of the latest available information, Salford Red Devils owe £1.6 million to Salford City Council. This debt primarily relates to the club's lease at the AJ Bell Stadium, and there have been ongoing discussions between the council and the club about restructuring this debt.”
Salford City Council have recently bought out Peel Holding for £7M at a time when most councils in England and Wales are strapped for cash. Salford City Council is believed to be £1.5 Billion in debt.
Salford Red Devils have far exceeded the goodwill of Salford City Council, and the Rugby League club have used the council like a personal piggy bank. They have assumed that possible income streams are available to be spend before they receive the money and in many cases the money never arrives. They have massively overprojected their ability to attract additional fans and to maximise commercial opportunities. How envious the SRD community board must be when they look West down the East Lancashire Road and see the Leigh Leopards achieving everything that they set out to do in the “Reds Rise Together” prospectus.
https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/uploads/p ... digital_(1).pdf
https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/uploads/p ... s_plan.pdf
The Salford debacle is only a few weeks away from being rectified one way or another. 30th January marks this months pay day (do they have the funds to pay?)
9th February marks Salford's first competitive game of the season and the need to register players with the RFL. Without a new paymaster will the £1.2M salary cap be enforced.
https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/wh ... strictions
Using the Wrexham takeover of a community club as an example - it took 6 months from NDA to announcement, and a further 3 months to ratify. Salford need to wrap it all up in less than 6 weeks or players are walking out on voided contracts.
|
|
How did Salford Red Devils get in this mess?
In April 2023 Salford Red Devils launched a community share scheme entitled “Reds Rise Together.” The aim was to raise between £250K - £2M to secure the long-term future of the club. Along with raising of capital, there were a number of commercial targets, like growing average attendances by 2000, securing income streams on matchdays and securing a long-term lease with money through refreshment sales.
SRD Holdings LTD Profit & Loss
Actual 2021 Actual 2022 Estimated 2023 Estimated 2024 Estimated 2025
Total Income 2612209 3154036 3469440 3900613 4321405
Total Expenditure 2961643 3734884 3873761 4395060 4511381
Profit/Loss Before Tax (349434) (580848) (404321) (494447) (189976)
The aim was to reduce the £580K loss in 2022 to a more manageable £189K loss in 2025 and break even some time in the near future. According to ChatGPT SRD were able to raise an incredible £1.5M, more conventional search engines put the figure at over £250K on the 30th May 2023.
The rest of the prospectus appears to have been less successful. Objective 3: To increase average match attendance by 2000 within 3 years. This in reality requires Salford to achieve average attendances of 6000 in 2025. The average figure in a successful season like 2024 was only 4646 way below the projected figure. This greatly impacts on the estimated income of nearly £4M which also incorporates the projected income stream for refreshments, which incidentally has still not been negotiated with Salford City Council, even though the season starts in just over two weeks time.
Salford City Council have periodically propped up the club with loans and grants to cover shortfalls in the SRD coffers. ChatGPT states that, “As of the latest available information, Salford Red Devils owe £1.6 million to Salford City Council. This debt primarily relates to the club's lease at the AJ Bell Stadium, and there have been ongoing discussions between the council and the club about restructuring this debt.”
Salford City Council have recently bought out Peel Holding for £7M at a time when most councils in England and Wales are strapped for cash. Salford City Council is believed to be £1.5 Billion in debt.
Salford Red Devils have far exceeded the goodwill of Salford City Council, and the Rugby League club have used the council like a personal piggy bank. They have assumed that possible income streams are available to be spend before they receive the money and in many cases the money never arrives. They have massively overprojected their ability to attract additional fans and to maximise commercial opportunities. How envious the SRD community board must be when they look West down the East Lancashire Road and see the Leigh Leopards achieving everything that they set out to do in the “Reds Rise Together” prospectus.
https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/uploads/p ... digital_(1).pdf
https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/uploads/p ... s_plan.pdf
The Salford debacle is only a few weeks away from being rectified one way or another. 30th January marks this months pay day (do they have the funds to pay?)
9th February marks Salford's first competitive game of the season and the need to register players with the RFL. Without a new paymaster will the £1.2M salary cap be enforced.
https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/wh ... strictions
Using the Wrexham takeover of a community club as an example - it took 6 months from NDA to announcement, and a further 3 months to ratify. Salford need to wrap it all up in less than 6 weeks or players are walking out on voided contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
New Signing | 7 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2025 | 0 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-leagu ... gm74wnn2mo
"It is important to add that the advancement monies were held by RL Commercial and payments administered directly from them - the club have never been given the funds to manage directly."
Looks like Salford players are getting paid this month.
|
|
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-leagu ... gm74wnn2mo
"It is important to add that the advancement monies were held by RL Commercial and payments administered directly from them - the club have never been given the funds to manage directly."
Looks like Salford players are getting paid this month.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
New Signing | 7 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2025 | 0 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Interesting that £500K pays for 3 months player salaries almost down to the last penny.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 331 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2021 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Best result is for Salford to complete takeover discussions and retain their players and a place in SL. Any other outcome is disastrous for the competition and TV deals. Sick of hearing all this negativity. We should be talking RL up because IMG aren't.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 307 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Looks like Salford have today managed to pay their players' wages for January.
According to reports the next key date is a week on Sunday, Sunday 9th February, when they have to have registered their players for their cup game against Midlands Hurricanes. It follows that to do so they will only be able to play and register players within their imposed salary cap.
The 9th February it is then. Watch out for last minute player sales and if there are any it is likely to involve Sneyd in which case do not rule out Leigh making a move.
Salford have to get the investment/take-over agreed, approved by RL and rescue finance in place in their bank account straight away before the start of the season. Whilst some things can happen in business fairly quickly, take-overs generally take much longer.
I fear that for Salford it is all not going to happen quickly enough, if at all.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Fringe Player | 246 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2021 | 3 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I suppose they could also sit out players for the beginning of the SL season too if they're convinced the takeover is going to happen. Still spending money on contracts though, so would be interesting to see if the sustainability cap might be further reduced if it drags on.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 307 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="micktheleyther":yk4t7ap5]I suppose they could also sit out players for the beginning of the SL season too if they're convinced the takeover is going to happen. Still spending money on contracts though, so would be interesting to see if the sustainability cap might be further reduced if it drags on.[/quote:yk4t7ap5]
Mick, my reading of the situation is that they cannot sit players out as you suggest. Players who are not registered will become free agents because they will not be paid. It follows that players who are registered must have a combined salary below or at the limit of the imposed salary cap. They cannot have paid players outside the salary cap limit. this is why they would have to sell.
Apologies if I am misunderstanding the position.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Fringe Player | 246 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2021 | 3 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="Jack Gaskell":ry2vs4z3]Mick, my reading of the situation is that they cannot sit players out as you suggest. Players who are not registered will become free agents because they will not be paid. It follows that players who are registered must have a combined salary below or at the limit of the imposed salary cap. They cannot have paid players outside the salary cap limit. this is why they would have to sell.
Apologies if I am misunderstanding the position.[/quote:ry2vs4z3]
I've got a bit of history in employment law, but it's been a while so I'm only 80% sure on what I'm saying here.
I believe the RFL have jurisdiction over players salaries. However, players are only players in the eyes of the salary cap regulations once they play a competitive game for the club. Until then they're just employees of the club. The RFL can refuse to register players if it would make the club break the salary cap rules.
I believe that if Salford chose to sit players to avoid registering them, then the player could, in theory, claim breach of contract as it could be demonstrated that they were signed to be part of the playing squad and that failing to register them is detrimental to their careers. I think it would be up to players to pursue that line themselves with the club and at employment tribunal if necessary.
If Salford were unable to make payroll at any point they would automatically find themselves in breach of contract and players would become free agents.
This should all be taken with a pinch of salt as I don't have detailed information on the regulations involved, but it is unlikely that the RFL have it within their remit to withhold the right of Salford to employ people in non-playing situations, which is what it would be if they don't register the players.
That being said, it could well be within the remit of the RFL to suggest that if Salford honour the contracts of players without registering them then they have not in fact reduced their costs in any meaningful way and their sustainability cap could be further reduced to compensate for that.
All in all, it's very complicated for Salford if the takeover doesn't happen soon and they have the sustainability cap lifted. There could be areas that would have to be clarified by tribunal or in the courts. They're also going against the spirit of what the RFL have asked of them.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 307 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="micktheleyther":171k7usr]I've got a bit of history in employment law, but it's been a while so I'm only 80% sure on what I'm saying here.
I believe the RFL have jurisdiction over players salaries. However, players are only players in the eyes of the salary cap regulations once they play a competitive game for the club. Until then they're just employees of the club. The RFL can refuse to register players if it would make the club break the salary cap rules.
I believe that if Salford chose to sit players to avoid registering them, then the player could, in theory, claim breach of contract as it could be demonstrated that they were signed to be part of the playing squad and that failing to register them is detrimental to their careers. I think it would be up to players to pursue that line themselves with the club and at employment tribunal if necessary.
If Salford were unable to make payroll at any point they would automatically find themselves in breach of contract and players would become free agents.
This should all be taken with a pinch of salt as I don't have detailed information on the regulations involved, but it is unlikely that the RFL have it within their remit to withhold the right of Salford to employ people in non-playing situations, which is what it would be if they don't register the players.
That being said, it could well be within the remit of the RFL to suggest that if Salford honour the contracts of players without registering them then they have not in fact reduced their costs in any meaningful way and their sustainability cap could be further reduced to compensate for that.
All in all, it's very complicated for Salford if the takeover doesn't happen soon and they have the sustainability cap lifted. There could be areas that would have to be clarified by tribunal or in the courts. They're also going against the spirit of what the RFL have asked of them.[/quote:171k7usr]
Mick, in addition to all you have just posted there is the issue of the players themselves. They are the collateral damage in all of this. The longer Salford's situation drags on without a successful outcome at the end of it then the more the players are prejudiced with limited choice for those who have to be sold as to where they go and with moves having to take place at, potentially, very short notice with the obvious impact upon them and their families of sudden upheaval caused by last minute transfers.
|
|
|
|
|