Might help you to do some reading Derek..And drop your challenge also..

What challenge is that then? I missed it. Just to help you ...sadly I agree with UKAD.

Folk are more obsessed with Sam Barlow than they are about Ryan Brierley they are 2 ex Leigh player's who have gone now,the same as Paul Rowley,I'm interested in tomorrow and getting to SL, as go UKAD?I'm more interested in UKIP

and I hate Politics.Bring on the Giants.

When did Barlow become an EX player Charlie?

In my view , yesterday , with a 4 year ban I can't see him playing for Leigh again , can you?

His 4 year ban started from last year.Not yesterday.I would say he's been an ex player for quite a while.

The neighbours CCTV forms a huge part of the UKAD's case and is mentioned many times in the documents.

After reading the adjudication I can think of only one word: pigheadedness.

One or two things were, however, not dealt with to the satisfaction of my curiosity

i) The preamble to the release mentioned the need to establish whether UKAD had given sufficient warning of the test, though I can't recall mention of the establishment of that being mentioned thereafter (or indeed any definition of what "sufficient warning" amounts to)

ii) No thought was, at least reported, to have been given to the question of whether Barlow was already aware that the test had been aborted before he gave his Doolittlesque profession to be willing, waiting and wanting to be tested. If UKAD had already decided that "tampering" had occurred and that that was sufficient to warrant the mandatory ban (and to be the sole accusation at the trial) why was this even reported?

iii) I wasn't impressed by the flippancy with which the black-capped QC used the phrase "shining like a ship's beacon" in an official adjudication. Yes, I know I stand correctly accused of all too often being flippant, but it did jar.