we have in Nicolson but I suppose if we do sign Govin we won't need a dual hooker anyway, Nico can play at 7 as well, I can see Basil going for a 2nd rower and a prop in any case.

Well with Duffy,Paul,Nicholson,Ridyard and possibly Govin that is those positions covered.
I`d go for a centre/winger now that Inglis is available.......He might like Lobby.

Just to get people thinking and to stimulate debate I think Nico could also cover the stand off position if needs be.

What a good idea, a stimulating debate at 2am on a cold November morning, has the milkman not been yet.

No idea I am lactose intolerant and put your heating on.

I`m not old enough to get heating subsidies.........This country only looks after the old,infirm and out of work folk...........

thing is though fred,if they do call him back,robbie can always drop back in there and someone else can go to loose.

big disruptions on team structures though is that, whereas you can cover a non pivot role easier

perhaps your right fred but we do need decent cover in the halves?.

it might have been posted somewhere but do you know if armstrong is to be used as a centre/winger?.

That'll be one of Govin's jobs when he's officially signed for us so that'll mean we'll have- Riddy, Paul, Duffy, Govin & possibly Nicholson too at our disposal

Armstrong is predominately a back and as basil seems to be going with littler as a forward I see Armstrong being utilised as only in the centre threequarters, he seems to play down the left hand attack track which is also where Nannyn plays so that will be interesting in selections.