He wasn't exactly innocent though was he?

what did he do

They were pushing against each other, i would have just laughed at Hock rather than played the silly ass with him, that silly thing footballers do were they push each others heads, it's like sumo wrestling with just heads.

lms was trying to put his head back in teh rightful position as loose, at the saints fed scrum, which hock was trying to steal from him, like the cheating he is.

Gonna be the kiss of death for Cat, but he's right. In fact, I had the conversation with my resident pie at the time.

It is quite clear, actually, Yed.

Like i'm going to watch that game again

you've been dipping into rogues drugs again, bridge pulled off a couple of high tackles in the mentioned game v huddersfield, no punchin/ fighting anywhere to be seen
i defy you to post times during the match when bridge threw anywhere near a punch... so stop lying and twisting the truth and pee off back to pie land!

Quote from the Tribunal (picked up by our very own Dave T on another forum:



What the actual hell?

Anyway, his appeal failed and it cost him an extra two hundred quid.

Hock totally started it, pushing on LMS's head. LMS gave some back, there was a bit of a headwrestle, LMS pushed Hock then Hock threw a punch and rabbit punched into LMS stomach. Hock's just nasty, it's really clear what happened.

Hock's an absolute end of a bell, shame because when he put's his one cell in to playing rugby mode he's a bloody good player.

a very good player, if he could just channel his aggression and not have another brainfart he will be best second rower in the league

leopard, spots.

Drugs, eye gouging, fighting..... Don't care how good, just would not have him around on the grounds of what it would say about the standards of the team and secondly the example shown to our younger players coming through.

You know, had Wigan actually bothered lo sack him, following his drugs test, that may have been the wake up call he needed to try and sort his head out, instead they pandered to him for two years then he just picked up where he left off.

Has anybody else read his disciplinary hearing for it on the RFL? [urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3700[/url



And then in his appeal:


Didn't quite work did it?


What does he class as repeated punching then?

They actually went even further, trumpeting in the media how fantastic his behaviour and attitude were. He game back into the game with a bigger head than when he left it.

Worked well for Newton that did...

Totally different situations and you know it.


That's deplorable that you'd use that in your typical point scoring fashion.

Poor form that.

a new low.

And he had the cheek to appeal against what he saw as a harsh punishment, but the RFL disciplinary board through it out, so he still has a 2 match ban and had to surrender a £200 Bond on top of his original £300 fine. Good to see that the disciplinary board still has some teeth.

What a total classy bloke you are!! Using someone's suicide to slag off a rival player on a forum that is seen all over the world. Just hope Terry's family don't read these forums. Pr**k!!!

Enicomb is a Wigan fan

I reckon that a top quality Coach could get him to channel that aggression in the right way.

Hock's coach teaches him how to channel his aggression*.






*the omnipresent blue-and-white striped shirt must have been in for its annual wash that day.