Just looking to see what kind of proportion are in favor of the new ruling.

Can we have another poll on when Marwan or Eric Pollard will ask for more? They will quickly want a second marquee to prevent a superstar young player being picked off by Union.

Would rather see the basic cap level raised and then linked to inflation.
What is the need to limit the additional spending to just one player? If a clubs wants to spread the extra payment across 5 players let them.

i have some reservations, is the rule to allow clubs to retain their homegrown star players to prevent them going to the NRL or to allow clubs to bring in an overseas big name? if its the latter i have concerns that we won't actually get the really big names, more rather than we will be saddled with some middling nrl players whose status gets pushed up by clever player agents. the game needs to be careful we don't just end up overpaying average players

This, the 'dispensation' that London had (£100k was it?) to allow for increase in living in that area was ridiculously out, if you can't at least have an inflation rise then you're effectively pushing wages down all the time and all the repercussions from that which we've already seen to a certain extent.

The winners of all this will be some players agents.

I would rather money be set aside to set up decent reserve grade (or a team) league.