Well at least one of those clubs tried to sign him last season, so, correct.

All those clubs have wanted Jamie Langley and still do.

Hell yes sign him up.

Wouldn't expect you to come out with anything to add to the debate.

So you wouldn't take him over Ablett, Kirke, Bailey or Burgess?

Ablett no, Burgess has time on his side but atm Langley's certainly a better, more consistant performer. I'd take him over Kirke anyday but you have to take into account that Langley is probably one of your top earning forwards, Kirke certainly doesn't fit this bracket at Leeds.

As for Bailey I'm really not sure tbh.

Either way I do rate Langley and am aware of his importance in your team. Although MOS candidate is going a little overboard.

You think Ablett is a better player than Langley?

I think Menzies, Hall, Lynch and possibly Scruton will be on more than Langley, although Langley's next contract will be his biggie.

People are only saying MoS candidate because of the way he's started, certainly not on 2009 form.

I'd compare Langley to JJB in Leeds' second-row, rather than Ablett, Kirke etc, and most of Langleys stats show he has more to offer than JJB - More meters per carry, more tackles, less missed tackles and less errors & penalties.

Jesus H, one win against a crap Cas side & you've Man of Steel. He is finally fulfilling his potential mind.

Thanks a lot. You nearly made me fire tea through my nose then.

Another 'I only follow my own team but still have opinions of every player in the league shocker'

You guys crack me up...so full of $h!7. Basically you have just named Leeds' low profile forwards. You've asked me a question of "would you take our best forward (seen as you rate him MOS) for one of your lesser forwards?"

The question you should of asked is "So you wouldn't take him over Peacock, Kylie, Ali, Eastwood, Sinfield".


My comment was Leeds, Wire, Saints,Wigan would LOVE Langley in their line-up. e.g star player status.


Ablett, Burgess and Bailey definately not. I rate Ablett and Burgess above him already and their only young and will without a doubt improve over the next couple of years and maybe be future England stars.

At this present time im not a huge fan of Kirke so maybe...but i doubt Leeds will go hell bent on getting Langleys signature just because he may be better than Kirke.

no

Look at Langley's stats over Burgess, Ablett, Kirke, Bailey and even JJB. He trounces them all.

my stats say langley was on a beach whilst jjb was having massive games in play offs and gf's. proving time after time he's a champion cog in a champion team. same can be said about bailey, ablett, kirke and burgess who have 15 gf rings between them. but langley is a champion at having a sun tan by gf night

all i heard all season from saints fans was about fgb's stats? there not a bad guide but dont tell the real story, he was still sobbing like a bitch on gf night again

Langley was in the '05 GF team that beat Leeds, so yes, he can play in big finals, even if they are few and far in between.

I agree that they don't tell the whole story, but players with stats like Langleys : Not too many errors, lots of metres, lots of carries, tremendous tackling etc, usually show a player who is for the team and a hard worker, the type of player that every team wants/needs.

is that the season you cheated and broke the cap brining in a player for the play offs, obviously a player you couldnt afford within cap/rules?

yeah i remember that season! well done to the bradford club

Yes it is. Your point being?

i put it to you that by cheating the cap you had blokes on the field who shouldnt have been there. especially moz. my point is that bradford cheated their way to a title, which the rfl acknowledged. its hardley a credable victory is it, or something that should be used in an argument about champion players! people dont say hey there goes ben johnson, hansie cronja, those guys were champions do they? langley was a part of a team/club/organisation that cheated their way to a title.

Aye, I didn't want Morley in myself. If he hadn't have come, Lynch would have played and we'd still have won, we were unstoppable at the end of '05.

It still doesn't take away from the fact that Langley is capable of playing in a final and is better than Ablett, Kirke, Burgess, Bailey & JJB.

you are talking about maybes here you would never know? you still cheated, morley or no morley thats a fact. your first sentance is you in dreamland again.

all those guys have backed it up year after year(3 times, 4 times) appart from burgess who i wouldnt swap for 2 langleys.

langley might be capable of playing in a final but its that long since he did its really hard to say how he would go. lets face it for now it doesnt look like bradford are gonna be playing in a final anytime soon let alone getting anywhere near winning one.

Ablett, Kirke and Ryan Bailey are absolute dogsh*t!

Jamie Langley was and always will be betterthan the 3 names above. Jamie Langley however dissapoints me whenever i see, not that his poor just because he could be so much better imo.

have got a 4 year and a 3 year deal from the back to back to back champions. tony smith bluey and gh must all think different regarding all 3. al take their opinion thanks

You wouldn't swap Burgess for 2 of Langers?

I wouldn't say that's dreamland either by the way. It's not like i'm dreaming of it, I was just saying in theory. I couldn't care less if we went over the cap, we still beat you in the final, and it was still a great match & feeling.

Yeah but you cheated. You cheated the system that's put in place to promote an even playing field and good spirt within the game. your club had no respect for those principles and chose to ignore the rules in greed of success. that must be a lovely feeling.