As an outsider <Batley fan> i have to say that the Wigan fans are by far the biggest moaners about all things RL,They clearly have a chip on their shoulders as to why they are no longer the top dogs dominating the game and winning all the silverware

It's a fair point but I'm struggling to see how I can incorporate it into my scoring as Ganson won't be reffing nor Tansey laiking against you. Though I might use it if I am desperate.
I still remember the incident with a mixture of hilarity & horror. I had had a bet & was up on every game. I was laughing at the ridiculousness of the penalty, the kick & try but screaming at the TV at the same time as I saw £50 down the drain. How I wish Whing Watch was in place for the aftermath of that one.

You cannot be serious in only allowing 50 years for Wakey and Wiggin fans, we at Odsal yield to no-one in retro whingeing.

Forget Tansey and Ganson, though that incident was indeed a lamentable J & D as well as being a travesty, what about the Voluntary tackle - in a Grand Final no less AND the ludicrous decision to send Penguin off at Saints in a play-off we were winning by ten points at the time [found no case to answer, let's not forget and would surely have won, and which was a J & D at 11 on a scale of 1 to10.

[i:3mn0adooEven Stevo[/i, though that could have been me talking to myself....

I remember one of the first matches I saw back in 85AD when the Bradfordium Taurorum as we were known then where playing the Wiganchester Pieetums at our old ampitheatre off the Via Manchester. The disgraceful ref sent of our promising Briganti winger off for cruxifiction for an alleged high tackle.

This was just before the emperor Nigelus Lignum declared that our rights to a % of the Gladitorial games receipts would be withdrawn for two years.

Some disgraces go on over the ies. I think 2000 year old whinges really should count double, and Alex Salmond agrees!

We all know tigertot's narcissism hour this week will got to Hull KR but let's be honest they're right it was bang wrong!

I won't bother checking their site but would tend to agree they have a claim. Virtually every decision you can see why the ref made that call but not in this instance (though it was the VR obviously).