Rumoured to have signed for us (London) next season.......

Any good?!

in a word, No.

Average in most aspects of his play, which is probably why he has only made about 10 appearances in his first team.

Oh great



Still, sounds like he'll still be an improvement on our current lot

He's got pace, but he's no half back

Pace ? Haha no he hasent.

Shocking player

I didn't think he was a slouch when he's played at full back.

Would this be slow pace ? Or the pace of a snail ? Or the pace of slowly drying concrete ?

He's had a good crack at the big time, has Ashe, but he's not made it. Unless he's a late mature, he's national league standard. It says something that I don't think he strengthens London's squad !

Being totally honest, he's very very poor. His defence is shocking and offers nothing in attack.

He looked a pretty good fullback when first broke into the team but couldn't hold that position down and has covered wing, halfback and hooker.

Not a super league player IMO.

Poor player. He wouldn't stand out at a Championship club in all honesty. As for him having pace - really!?!?

I really don't recall him being that slow when he's played in the past.

He must have something about him because he's hung around a lot longer than other youth players have, it's been two years since he made his first team debut, unless we signed him on a ridiculously long contract? It's obviously not worked out for him here, for whatever reason, and he may kick on going elsewhere. He may not of course...

To be fair to him I think he was highly rated a few years ago. But he had a few serious injuries and looks battered now. He has lost any pace he did have and I really can't understand where London would play him. If they are signing players in preparation for playing in a lower league then it's perhaps understandable. When do the proposed changes come in?

He's not as slow as he looks I reckon.

Whilst he was poor for us earlier in the season, he was filling in at half back, which is not his position and, even though he struggled, he would come up with the odd play that was very nice.

He's a full back, a position we've seen him play rarely in the 1st team. He does look like a very assured player though.

However, despite being a full back, they moved him to #6 in the reserves to allow the likes of Swift and Gaskell play the glamour fullback role.

Play him fullback and you may get a decent player, but there's certainly better players out there to be signed.

I think i would be fair to say he isn't fast

, I'd back him in a sprint over Wello but thats about it.

Showed a lot of promise as a younger player but doesn't seem to have developed since he was 17

Well perhaps third time lucky then? after Foster & Gaskell!

A home grown version of Leon Felton surprised he has remained on the books for so long.

Never done anything of note for me, let him go.

Yea thats all weve produced.

Don, just read before getting all hot & bothered, there is no denying, that both Foster & Gaskell after done well since leaving the club, and I am certain it would never have been Foster's choice to leave.

All I was trying to point out is that some young players who leave, or are told they are no longer wanted,find a new club does them the world of good, to prove something at least. You are not saying that Fosters goal kicking was missed at first.

We wont miss Foster,Gaskell we could but he's running out of coaches at quite a young age.
I look forward to your next instalment of Saints doom and gloom.

Even Salford don't want Gaskell

I wish Gaskell, all the best with The Bulls, like I did when you signed Louis! Having worked in youth rugby, been a Lancashire and GB selector, nothing more do I like than to see young lads do well, at any club!

He's not even a saints fan, he's a turncoat.