Tommy Lee IS a good signing for Saints, coming from someone who has seen plenty of him over the last few seasons. Here's why;

1. He's a workhorse. If it wasn't for his injuries in 2015 and 2016, he would be Super League top tackler without a doubt. At both points in the season up until his injury he was leading this.
2. He's solid and dependable. Rarely have I seen him have a "poor" game in a Salford shirt and is very consistent.
3. Versatility. Whilst he is a hooker he can also cover at half-back and do a stint at 13 if need be. Crucial asset over the course of a season.
4. Has a very good kicking game for a hooker, which Salford don't utilise enough.

I can understand why his signing would be met with disapproval, but I can see the logic. The only down side I can see is his injury record. He has had two lengthy injuries over the last two seasons which is the reason we're getting shut. We just cant afford to carry him on the cap anymore.

With all that said and done what with Tasi, Theo and Lee you're assembling quite a group of Salford rejects

Or possibly not www.loverugbyleague.com/news_227 ... ation.html

Or possibly not www.loverugbyleague.com/news_227 ... ation.html

Quote ="Trainman"Or possibly not www.loverugbyleague.com/news_227 ... ation.html'" If that's true, they've clearly responded to fan pressure. They clearly read the forums, which is great to see.

Quote ="Trainman"Or possibly not www.loverugbyleague.com/news_227 ... ation.html'" If that's true, they've clearly responded to fan pressure. They clearly read the forums, which is great to see.

I think it was your threat to hound the Saints Twitter feed that swung it.

I think so too.

Cunningham was referring to me when he made his comment about the Saints fans being sheep following the one guy who thinks negatively.

So, he's solid, dependable and consistent, except for when he's injured for half a season? Sounds like a quality signing.