Just out of interest, how many of you lot on here were singing "the referee's a wa**er" or "cheat cheat cheat" at the end of the game?

I couldn't believe my ears when I heard it. How biased and blinkered can one set of fans be? It was a blatant high tackle for the penalty, which was only 1 of 2 that we received all day, and the time-keeping was a complete non-issue, as only an idiot would think that the official in charge of sounding the final hooter would be using the same clock that we were all looking at.

And then walking back to the car, the amount of Hull KR fans claiming to have been robbed was unbelievable!

Despite all of that, I though you played well today, and definitely deserved at least a draw. I thought Paea, Mika and Hall were very impressive. But to claim that we cheated in any way, or that you were robbed, is absolute nonsense.

I agree with u all in all thought it was an evenly played game like in all games of rugby sum decisions can be a bit bizarre and Thaler ain't a favourite at KR I thought a draw was a fair result Cos at 14 nil down u shud ave ad the game in the bag, I thought our forwards matched urs easily and maybe with our halfbacks it wud ave bin a different story, none the less was a grt entertaining game of rugby wud ave bin a corker bin the sky game.

While I don't disagree with much of your post I must wish you luck in finding that mythical rugby league club which doesn't have a number of one eyed fans among it's support.
I would advise against beginning your quest in St Helens.

The time on the clock is kept by the OFFICIAL timekeeper, When it hits zero at every home game the hooter sounds.

The timekeeper at HKR is a big Rovers fan and that certain fact

Yay!

You've brought your incomprehensible posts over here. You are most welcome.

As to the OP, it's a pantomime, you shout for things for your team, you try to influence the referee. When you look back at the game or even at the time, you know you're wrong, it's just part of being in a crowd.

I really cannot believe I have to explain this.

I thought the Ref was deserved of the jeers, did very everything to keep Saints in it including ignoring forward passes for 2 tries, the players offside from the last dropout and what the hell was that scrum awarded for?

Poor, I enjoyed winding up the Saints fans walking to the car, unhappy with just one point, your fans arrived expecting to win, glad we gave you a game.

I agree mate, every team, Saints included ,have their fair share of biased individuals.
I just felt that the reaction from your fans at the end was incredibly uncalled for.

I agree with the bit about trying to influence the ref,etc. But the game was over and yet a large number of your fans were of the opinion that you were in some way robbed, which wasn't the case.

Saints bus, the Yellow one - fly tipping his rubbish over the fence. Mucky.

Was that to make a seat spare for Thaler?

I don't think anyone was calling Saints cheats, but Thaler isn't a favorite at Craven Park.

looked a cracking game on telly,

I'd hazard a guess that we were so close to beating a full strength Saints team with an injury ravaged side in what was a highly entertaining game that it was frustrating to see Saints in possession and doing their usual last gasp desperation breakaway thing. It was a high shot nobody can deny that especially after seeing it on Sky! What we can ask for clarification on is why Saints got possession. Webster didn't knock on it clearly went backwards and then forwards off your player before being gathered by Lovegrove. That I think is where the initial frustrations came from. Not forgetting your first try was dubious and could easily have been a knock on decision, will admit though hard to call at the spare of the moment.

And David Hodgson was tipped head first to the ground, lost the ball which Saints picked up and scored from a couple of plays later.

Not only was saints 1st try a possible knock on it was forward for the last pass- skys just made the knock on or not still a 50/50 call. But deffo looked forward on sky.

Didnt really see the high shot but again after seeing it on sky id say it was high- but ive also had saints friends who said thaler was our man of the match so people in glass houses n all that.

That would be a joke, yes? We haven't won at Craven Park since 2007 in the league. Why then would Saints fans be anticipating a win there now? I know me and all around me were anticipating a loss and couldn't believe it when we went 14-0 up.

You do realise how it works don't you?

After watching it back on sky, yes the shot was high. However, like Nick says, it was the decision making in the run up to that which was suspect. As for your generic view of our supporters

Really? We have three of our most influential players out; two being half backs and one our captain, and you really didn't even anticipate a win at all? Find that hard to believe myself.

Yet chose to discuss the 5 games following Hull KR, like it was a given.

Yes that's all well and good talking about your game but nobody is interested in that

only 7600 there ! inc away fans as well



This 10,000 will NOT happen and the North Stand won't either , stick or twist ?

I know 2400 off break even, still could of been worse we could have been 4500 away from it

That's what I was thinking to it was a disappointing attendance for our first home game

Ano the giants wire game I thought it was end to end stuff mind the one on yesterday was like watching paint dry two very poor sides