For the £££s

I agree and that is not a criticism of Burns.

Chase has beaten Rovers single handed on more than one occasion we have just not been able to deal with him at all. Hock ran riot against us at Widnes last year too. I think it is unwise to dismiss the merits of these players or indeed of Salford though they may suffer from a lack of depth.

I personally wish Rovers had these 2 players they ooze star quality something I think we are short of.

chases individual flair is at odds to the good of a team. That's the reason I'd not want him

I wouldn't say I was clueless but I don't see Chase as a great player. He's pretty good and has shown this on many occasions against HKR. I wouldn't be keen on him coming to play for Rovers as I doubt the rest of the team would benefit.

Hock is a good, strong player. Would I want his influence around at Craven Park? No.

Salford have brought in a good 1-17 but a lot of it is ageing and with age comes injuries. Their back end of the squad is not strong enough to compete regularly in the top 8 of this league.

Chase vs Burns is an interesting one. Think it depends on how the rest of the team is doing.

Off the back of a dominant pack Chase can be devastating, however when the going gets tough he tends to disappear and. Burns, on the other hand, can turn games round with his kicking game and calculated risk taking. At the moment with the current Rovers squad (and salary demands) I'd take Burns over Chase.