Here is this weeks Diary courtesy of Joe, It includes our resident 'officials' views on the controversy on Friday night plus all the usual rubbish! Thanks as always for all your support Wilf www.blackandwhites.co.uk/

Here is this weeks Diary courtesy of Joe, It includes our resident 'officials' views on the controversy on Friday night plus all the usual rubbish! Thanks as always for all your support Wilf www.blackandwhites.co.uk/

Player putting his arm/foot on or over the whitewash after held is called but before the ball is played

Id also go for B- player should have been sin binned

Thanks again for another great read

Answers to quiz -
Player should have been sin binned
A player (whilst in possession) can regain his feet by putting his foot in touch.

I claim the £10 and donate it to the dobbins new stadium appeal - the poor luvs

Thanks for another entertaining read Wilf.

Another good read Wilf, thanks.

Great read once again Wilf. A few of us were throwing names around for player of the season, Danny's heroics with the boot have put him right up there. It would be so easy to take him for granted.

The answers to this weeks Refereeing questions are as follows

The answer to to the first one is B - the tackling player should have been binned as late challenge on the kicker is mandatory sin bin - it would be red if it was high or used the elbow.

The sceanrio in the second one is actually after a tackle is complete. EG. A player is tackled half a metre in from touch. Ref calls held. In the act of standing up, the ball carrier steps into touch, this would not be flagged and a play the ball would be allowed. One of those anomalies of the rules, but all the same would no doubt have the masses yelling at the touch judge to stick his flag up.



'