If you all knew what went on. The referees had been told prior to this weeks game that any chicken wing tackle would get sinned bim. Interesting how Radford ran straight off no Hull player or any one argued with the referee. You are a set of biased supporters who try to run the game. Every opposition pass is forward, every opposition tackle is head high.

No one likes coming to the KC Stadium or for that matter of fact coming to Hull. It is a very intimidating place and not for the faint hearted or families. Unlike Castleford where every single away teams supporters say it is one of the best pl;aces for atmosphere and freindliness (except Wakefield and Featherstone).

Not from Cas old cocka. Try get it correct.

Biased as well as no personality. It was a JOKE. Still a disgrace. Don't care what anyone says. Nothing should make him do that.

So [inot[/i every single away teams' supporters, then?

You seem to have mistaken your opinion for everyones

I really enjoy KC stadium. Great place to watch sport.

Dont come then...dont expect any of us will lose any sleep.

Alot of cas and hull fans come on here praising the relationship the two sets of fans have so i dont no were your getting that from?? I never saw any trouble on friday...what was intimidating about it????

There's no point arguing about a sin-bin as the ref is never going to reverse the decision. However Radford denied that he did anything wrong in the post-match interview and the video evidence apparently backs this up. He also pointed out that Ferres did the exact same tackle 5 minutes later and Child ignored it.

And it's not just chicken-wing tackles being targeted either. I would have thought that someone so well-informed would have known that.


And you're a second-rate troll who seems to have got bored of being embarrassed on the Rovers board and wandered over here in hope of better pickings.

Please can anyone tell me, when we pushed the cas player in to touch why did cas get the scrum.

childs ruled that cas hadn't got over the advantage line, another joke decision that went against us, next set they scored if i remember

My view too

You have won 2 matches out of 8, and Agar blames the ref everytime, except against Wakefield when he said you should have been 30 points up at half time= what ever, what a plonker.

To be fair to Agar he has rarely blamed referee's but with the mounting pressure he and the board are jumping at every opportunity to take the spotlight off the coach and his performance.

Longy I hear was still bloody angry before be went back on

Why was he allowed back onto the field in that state ?

That would be because we needed to score and he is one of our creative players. And if he hadn't been hammered high and then found the penalty had not gone for him but against him AFTER he came back on I dare say he wouldn't have made the high shot he did.

Still nothing short of pi[is[/is-poor man management

Utter tripe.

so, it's a masterstroke to return a player, who is still under the red mist, back into the fray?

Child's performance should never be allowed to smokescreen the dismal failings of Agar as a coach. Stop being so pathetic

I beg to differ

Why send onto the pitch a player that was in no fit mental state to perfom, he was intent on getting his own back and the coaches should have been aware of that even sat in the stand. If they did not know then I suggest they move some one into the dug out that can communicate properly.

We have all seen players who have been subbed before the ref as acted , indeed many refs will send a clear message to either the bench or the captain that he had better be removed.

Don't call me for being pathetic simply because I don't accept your 'spin' against the club. I travelled 240 miles on Friday night to watch Child ruin my entertainment. I was livid on the way home because of his performance and nothing else. The views aired by the club I agree with wholeheartedly.

And your talk of smokescreen and alike is based entirely on a comment by Ian P - someone who is hardly a club sympathiser - who said he had heard that Long was ed off.



You're the one who needs to get a grip pal. And I notice you're unable to comment on the actual performance of the referee. Wonder why.

I only have your word for that so I will stick to what I know which was that until he was smashed again he had not acted in the way he did at the end.

I wasn't there, that's why.

In all the posts I have made since Friday's match, I have made absolutely no comment on Child's performance for the simple reason that because I never saw it, I cannot feel qualified to comment.

I have seen & read Agar & Hetherington's comments though and their actions fall far short of what I would expect from club officials.

That surprises me - I thought you must have been sat on the bench as you see fit to criticise the management for allowing Long back on the field when he was REALLY angry even though you can have no knowledge whatsoever of his state of mind.

So you wont comment about the ref but you will comment about the interchanges. Laughable.

FWIW,Long is experienced enough to keep his ''anger'' in check!

Lets look at the facts

Long binned in the 26/27th minute of the second half

Long red carded in the 36th/37th minute of the second half

That says he was hardly back on the pitch before being sent off.

So he never really had much chance to act the way he did before being sent off.