Stotic out for around 8 weeks appartently due to Cunninghams cheap shot... Gonna get sighted and a 3 match ban for me ... I like the guy and was out of charactor but needs to be punished for that... As for Saints, look like there starting to struggle with injuries as Roby is another memeber of the casulty long term list...

Will JD's receive a ban for the forearm?

as it wasn't even a foul my gut feeling is no

Indeed I don’t see how it could result in a ban given it was looked at when the Grix try was awarded and deemed OK.

Wellens has gone for a scan this morning. Don't know what for though.

His eyesight?

No.

Initial contact is by open palmed hand on shoulder. Any contact by arm/elbow is as a consequence of the initial contact and is not intentional. The arm is not promoted into the face. Hand at all times is loose.

Cunningham


No charge

Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution

Probably just me being a conspiracy theorist but anybody else think this might have been viewed differently if it had been Stosic on Cunningham?

Or perhaps they just bottled it as Roby is injured and therefore don't want to leave Saints with no hookers!



Shocking decision that you can lash out at someone, fracture their eye socket/cheekbone and not get a ban. What sort of message does that send out to youngsters??

I thought that you were attempting a bit of satire on the possible judgement of the panel until I realised it was the actual rationalisation from the disciplinary hearing.

I don't think even I would joke about something like that. Should have been at least a one match ban.

My English musn`t be too good, how can an INTENTIONAL jab result in ACCIDENTAL contact, contradictory or what? Typical RFL gobbledeygook.

I also noticed that Wakefield`s SIMON grix received a caution, when did we sign him?

He intentionally meant to punch him.....but it wasn't meant to be in his eye. Perhaps his nose, his mouth or his chin?

Thats a joke if so !! How can he get away with it ?? - Stotic is out fot 8 WEEKS !!??

As for JD's elbow ... what elbow ?? it was his hand first point of contact ...

complete balls to me. even more annoying is that ferres will miss sunday due to his late challenge on the prodgical son! i never even noticed it shows you how bad it was.

Any confirmation of this yet or still just rumour???

***Found it.***

No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution


R F L have lost the plot.

Ferres may not be banned yet. Might just get a NFA or a fine.

With what Cunnigham got, I think Ferries will recieve a cup of tea and a biscuit and the joke that is the RFL will GIVE Ferries £300.

Didn't really expect anything else from the RFL.

Cunningham should have got at least 2 matches.

Or they hit him hard and throw Fat lads ban on to his

Quote ="BIGAL1"Or they hit him hard and throw Fat lads ban on to his '" www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 85,00.html banned for the derby

Quote ="BIGAL1"Or they hit him hard and throw Fat lads ban on to his '" www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 85,00.html banned for the derby

you got your £300 right

One rule for one, different rule for the other



Although its to our adv ferres is out.