www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2009 not bad

www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2009 not bad

No not bad Mutts BUT........the offloads are our problem and their match winner,something we have to sort if we are to challenge them.

When you realise we have played 2 games more than them the stats aren't as good.

spoil sport

pro rat'd I would say on most things we look comparable, except you cant get away from 6 more missed tackles and 25 more errors than us and having played 2 games less....oh and the table never lies

Those stats are garbage, do you really believe we have only missed 15 tackles all season? We will have players in the squad who have missed more than that individually, we must have missed at least 30 in the Hudds game alone!

Plus stats never tell the full story do they? Saints game for instance

Dont tell Wadski that

I will be happy to see our sats improve whilst Bradford's deteriorate

Stats favoured us when we played them in edinburgh and they comprehensively beat us ! we'll be in for a tough old game against em.

lies, damned lies and statistics.

I feel bad now Mutts. Didn't mean to put the post down.


Though I do wonder how accurate the team stats are, our error rate comes down if you pro rata it across games too so this is an obvious weakness for Bradford.

This is a winable game for us as long as we control our own ball, and Menzies. The rest will take care of itsellf

Did they, I thought a late flourish and 4 Wakey tries disallowed was more the reason.

We lost four in a row but only really played badly in 2 of them IMHO, Trinity fans do tend to lose perspective at times

wakefield lead in attacking kicks.

Does out on the full count