If Wakefield can put up with his antics , Then yes .

Don't think it is even a debate. Answer is YES

Brough can be immature off the field at times, but when he's on form, like he was yesterday, then it can only prove what a valuable asset he is to the team. Not just his drop goal, his try, but the pass for Peterson's try, no defence would have stopped that.

Do you want a player who can change a game, but sometimes goes missing, or a vanilla player who is solid, but can never be spectacular?

Simple answer - YES

Phil Clarke last night mentioned Wally Lewis when Danny threw out that tremendous pass for Petersen's try, also he said there won't be another pass as good as that this season.

Stay Danny and lets build a team around you..................

I'm younger than Danny and I'm immature most of the time, just ask anyone who knows me or our Doris, she'll tell you.

yes yes yes yes

i suppose so

In my opinion, Broughy is one of the best hafl backs in SL....However, he comes with that hot headed nature.

In answer to the main question here, Yes, broughy is good enough to form a team around...

However...

Huddersfield think that too and they'll be doing it as of next season. so this debate is a little pointless!

Don't think its Hudds we need to be worried about ...

Danny brough to sign a two year extension. Just what i been told. Loves working under JK and wants to stay. Great if true.

Should be no debate on this one the chances of us finding/affording a player with half is quality are slim to none. Really hope he stays would be a bigger loss than Solo if he went.

The better half backs have always been like that.

had my doubts when he first came, but have none now. wakefield is a better team with brough in it. warts and all.

He's quality, end of.

I wish would be great news, as would blanch signing a new deal

His attitude is a key asset. We had a very talented half-back without that attitude and Bradford are welcome to him.

I was thinking the same, could also say it about Rooney!

For a club renowned for selling on its outstanding talent, the loss of Danny Brough (if he did indeed go) would be up there with the best of them. We need to be building a team around him, no doubt about it.

Agree. If we dont keep and build around players of his quality it will be the thing that seperates us from clubs with ambition.

I know its easy to say and resources are limited but we should do all we can to keep the best players and also to try not to changes large parts of the squad every season.

Most definitely YES. Keep him and build for the future.

There's a thin line between genius and madness, and he's tip-toeing right along it!

Keep him - 9 time out of ten he's worth the entrance money on his own!!

he's going nowhere, i am 100% definately sure of it.
something to do with a mouth and some horse

Its not that we intentionally sell them. Sometimes a club like us has no choice...let me give you an example, lets use broughys name for ease of using a name....

lets say Brough is contracted for this season and next to us....

Lets say there is a club higher up the league than us who wants him....

Lets say that he wants to go to that club because he thinks he can win trophies there....

Lets say a public offer comes in for him...which we reject....

Brough now knows that top team is interested in him and he states he wants to go....

as a club we now have two options, reject all offers and make him see his contract out, lose him for nothing financially and have a season where he just tosses it off because he doesnt want to be there...

or we agree to release him from the final year of his contract in exchange for some financial and/or player gain....


either way, we lose a quality player for little or nothing and we generally feel short changed.

Im sure the club see broughy as an excellent player and a player they want to keep....but...they may soon be faced with such a dilema as stated above.....

in some respects, the club is on a hiding to nothing and at the end of the day the club has to make money to keep going...and if it means there is a big financial reward available now for losing a player, rather than no financial reward in 12 months, the club is not in a position to potentially turn their noses up at a deal worth 200k to the club