Yes thought Miller was very good at fullback today

Agreed. He's played well each time he's been there, without necessarily looking like a proper fullback!

In the case of Dane Nielson, His issues are off the field and aren't much different to those of Monaghan, Carney, Bird etc who still manage to be great players on the field, which is where we need it.

Sammut was a bad influence off the field and not that great on it, for us at least, so nothing like the names suggested above.

Can't agree. He didn't do much wrong but as he spent three quarters of his time slipping onto his backside so for me can't be classed as being very good. The lad needs some new studs.

You really are making yourself look a bigger fool than normal.

Three coaches and all have recognised what a waste of space this player really is.

I can forgive you on Agar and Webster but when one of the most successful coaches in RL history takes over and shows the guy the door after less than 10 days! It should tell any reasonably intelligent person all they need to know - but alas not you.

What's so hard to get here - he never got a chance you say (even though he got plenty) - why - because he never came close to deserving one - get over it.

No doubt now he will become one of those legends that never was who got away that you and a few others love to create.

Shame... such an obvious pure rugby talent... Brought a smile to the face with ball in hand!

Seems clear that he never actually wanted to put his all into the club... Will be remembered by me as a failed project. A failure by the club to manage him and a fail by himself for wasting his talent!

If Sammut was that good as in some peoples eyes then why were the top coaches not knocking the doors off the hinges at BV for his services some time ago.

never really got a chance- thought smith could of changed him.

https://twitter.com/trinityheritage/sta ... 0789716992 ??

https://twitter.com/trinityheritage/sta ... 0789716992 ??

I like him (if it's who I remember). Think he has taken Godinet's place while he's been with us as they didn't want to fly him back.

I hope it doesn't mean he is replacing either Godinet or McShane but he's a good player whether he is or not.

He's got to be replacing one of Godinet, Howarth or McShane unless he's coming as a centre.

It would have been nice to have
6. Godinet
9. McShane

14. Sio

but having just signed Howarth on an 18 month contract I can't see him being replaced.
The only other combination would be
3. Sio
6. Godinet
9. McShane

14. Howarth

Nail on the head!

Some fans insist on seeing every player who leaves the club as an example of how much more they know than the incumbent coach - despite every other coach in SL also ignoring their obvious talents...

It's a tough ask for a 22 year old kid with no first grade experience to travel accross the world to come into a situation like ours. He's played a few games for Samoa but has had limited game time in them, from memory they played Josh McGuire (prop) at hooker for most of this years test. Like you seeing as we have just signed Howarth as well i worry it is because maybe McShane is on his way.

www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyl ... paign=1490

www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyl ... paign=1490

See he won't be playing against Bradford!

That’s Workington relegated then.

The albatross strikes again.

How can anyone say he is not a good player because we have seen very little of him but based on his previous clubs all we're disappointed to see him go. I suspect that like Collis BS had his hands tied because it was already decided that Sammut would be released.
I admire the way some on here without any knowledge can ascertain that Sammut will not improve Workington because he will. I personally believe he would of been a better choice than Miller but for reasons he was never given a chance.

I think if B S wanted Sammut he would have been staying. It would also appear his options were limited, Workington to the end of the season is hardly a choice to be put at the top of the list.
His signing most be one st strangest in the history of Wakefield.

So those thinking he isn't good enough don't have enough evidence to say so but you have enough evidence to say he is good?

I noticed that too. Registration not through in time. Seems strange, bearing in mind we released him a whole week ago

Appears he's got some weird aversion to playing against Bradford...

Fans will have to wait to see Sammut play as his registration documents aren't expected to be through in time for the visit of Bradford Bulls on Sunday.

MHM SURE!

Historically yes at Wakefield no but why the latter you will need to ask those in charge. I doubt it would be down to one game at Bradford which many quote, if that was the criteria we would not have any players to select from because all will have had bad games in the past.

For what it's worth and just my opinion but I feel the problem with Sammut is much more than Rugby related. The slate could have been wiped clean numerous times from a playing point of view…….think there's a lot more to it and that's why we are not hearing a thing. Time to move on I think.

What fans think is irrelevant. Agar, Webster, Dickins and now Smith have had the option to play Sammut regularly and they chose not to. The clubs he has featured for over here have tended to be the ones that have struggled and despite being a free agent he has sign for Workington. Whilst on his day he has a talent on a maverick sort of way, his abilities are being somewhat over egged by some.