could we not have sued cala for the rest of the money and we would not be in this mess

I sense a lynch mob in the making!

So do tell us Almighty Fountain Of All Worldly Knowledge why Cala Homes have no involvement at all???

they probably had an option to backout written in the contract.

Unfortunately not because the remaining funds were only due when we left BV.

so we leave and then sue um

I wonder if the contract was as watertight as Ted's contract with Sainsburys?

Not Tillions accounts but the club's accounts to show rentals it pays to Tillion and the costs it has undertaken on Tillions part.
I realize why Tillion is registered in the IOM and that is to hide the true facts of the deal to sell BV. The asset that BV was to Wakefield Trinity RLFC is an asset to the club no more. It is as plain as day that greed and self importance was more important than the survival of Wakefield Trinity.

Ted who owns Belle Vue ?

That should be the only question anyone who loves this great club should now be asking.

If we have had over 2m quid why have the BOD previously stated we have only had 1/2 with the other half due when we leave Belle Vue?

Something dodgy about all this and the lack of detail around valid questions asked re the share offer

The question was asked, but suprise suprise the club did not answer it along with a host of other questions from fans who were willing to consider the share offer based on the right responses

are you the gobby bloke at quins last year who bollocked the players at the end

When were the accounts of wtwrlfc last given to the share holders and for what year were they for.

I am guessing that the origional author of the piece and the op are VERY closely linked...

I didnt get to see the article in the press so cant comment on that... but given the current discussion, and the general feeling on here I too would like to ask the question:


Ted.... who owns belle vue?

Well I've just done a search asking if cas have got all their funding for glasshougton and it came back "no information found" but it didn't cost £4.50
TRINITY FOREVER

As WTRLFC Ltd is a relatively small company it only has to file Abbreviated Accounts (and unfortunately I no longer work with the company through who I would have been able to see the full accounts).

The abbreviated accounts only show the balance sheet and very limited supporting notes. There is nothing in there to detail any rental payments on the land, but equally the amount owed by the club's debtors at 31 Dec 2009 suggests that the £600k due from Cala was still expected to be paid.

Not all the players - just the one that blew the 3 on 1 overlap that would have kept us in the match right at the end.

Still doesn't explain the fact the club said they received half (which means that if 600k was owed, there is 800k unaccounted for)

Looks like it, signed up just to post that message it would seem

Im sure TRB could clear all this up with one of his famous

s .

Mind you I am sure I recall him saying that the club were due £1.3m on Belle vue and that WTWC would be putting that into the Newmarket pot.

Something here stinks. We need answers and we want them NOW.

Whats op ?

And Santa Claus really exists.

Original Poster

I would also add that if Ted's claim against the Solicitors who advised him on the Sainsbury's deal was a goer, I would have expected their insurers to cough up by now. They would not want to incur interest and additional costs in dragging the matter on, unless they believed there was a good defence to the claim.

Possibly unrelated to this discussion I know, but perhaps more evidence that what was portrayed as the case in that instance, may not have been entirely true, and why it is hard to believe anything Ted says.

His silence re the share offer questions speaks volumes - the club is desperate for the cash and he can't give the answers people want before they will consider giving their cash. If there was nothing to hide, why not just provide all the answers?