[quote="PopTart":3mbzl5li]They can play there but we should have 6 who play there without disrupting other positions. Of course Vagana could be the 6th but I think we are trying to make him a SR so he should be focusing on that first. Lingard is too young for now. He's an occasional player for me till he develops. Cozza no. He should only be cover. We don't have enough cover at 13.[/quote:3mbzl5li] Vagana is a prop but we seem to be trying him more at second row. I think he will play on bench for us as a second row and come on for impact after 55/60. But he is a prop and certainly good enough and big enough to play there. Will be interesting to see how he develops. Shaw and Lingard are there if we start to struggle with injuries. At least we have options. 13 is an area we are short in, I’m curious who will be favourite to spell with Pitts in the 17. I think it could possibly be Hood for final 20.

[quote="Pat Bateman":24rbxs61]If only Pitts wasn’t 5 years younger.[/quote:24rbxs61] True, but he wasn’t as good a player 5 years ago. Funny how it works like that for some players - right conditioning, right life stage, right role. I’m sure he wishes it had all happened sooner too.

[quote="Butcher":hflpgs21]True, but he wasn’t as good a player 5 years ago. Funny how it works like that for some players - right conditioning, right life stage, right role. I’m sure he wishes it had all happened sooner too.[/quote:hflpgs21] Yes good point, just look at Westerman, played arguably the best rugby of his career with us.

[quote="God":3h6d4dz2]This next one he is really something different [/quote:3h6d4dz2] Nice to see you on this fine Monday morning God What have you got for us old boy? "Call to me and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know (particularly about the great Wakefield Trinity)" - Jeremiah 33:3

[quote="homme vaste":1w77xong]Nice to see you on this fine Monday morning God What have you got for us old boy? "Call to me and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know (particularly about the great Wakefield Trinity)" - Jeremiah 33:3[/quote:1w77xong] good morning to you, lets just say your prayers are answered in the young we must trust. And I would stop smoking what ever that is

[quote="Butcher":b1spdczd]Agree on Cozza. He’s a really good all round player, just not brilliant at this level. And that’s a good player to have backing up. If we signed a top drawer 13 they’d surely depose Pitts, and do we need that this year? Next year, absolutely. I’m happy with our squad, have been for months. My only concern is our depth on the wing, but I’d be fine with Myers getting a shot (he has played there), or us bringing someone strong in on loan should it come to it. As for Makin, I was keen when I first heard about it, but reading that article my heart sank a bit. It’s totally fair of him to want to play for Wigan, but I’d only really want players who are desperate to play for Wakey right now, like Isaac Shaw. Perhaps Makin’s a slightly better player than Shaw - is it worth that shift in culture?[/quote:b1spdczd] Yes agree on both counts. I'd rather put faith in Shaw. The mind set is a big part of being successful and Makin's isn't on Wakefield And as you and Trojan say, we have to wait and see with zcozza. Right now I think he's good backup with potential to be good starter.