Is it worth recalling him from loan? IMO Marsh isnt ready for SL yet, I dread to think what damage Huddersfield/Warrington would have done to that wing of Marsh & Goulding this afternoon.

It is an option that definatley needs considering Marsh was steady for me today but like you say i wouldnt be overly confident with him and Goulding alongside each other over the next few weeks.

Leave Pryce where he is in my opinion.

He is currently playing quite well and does not have to put up with abuse of the fans. Give him time to sort his game out and then bring him home.

I can see Charnley shifting in there anyway once Pat is back, so it's a non-starter really.

That said, I don't know when Pat's back so maybe I'm being a little too presumptuous. For me Marsh had a good game today, but I can't see him coping with Wire and Huddersfield very well at all. Not yet anyway.

Agreed. We can't just rush him back because of one good performance.

Next weeks going to be interesting as to who plays centre. It certainly won't be Joel, and Madge does seem to really like Marsh there.

i think marsh and goulding would get mullered against warrington or huddersfield. Maybe pryce is not a bad option

I think it would be a good idea to bring Pryce back to help make things more solid on the right hand side. Like someone has already said, the likes of hudds and wire would pepper Goulding and Marsh, Pryce is doing well at the moment so i don't see any reason to not give him another crack at the whip.

I'd have started this thread even if Karl hadnt had a stormer against Saints. He's defensively sound and will score a few trys too.

Pryce would have scored the try that Marsh failed to in the first half today.

I think we all need to stop panicking !!!

I agree. No need for panic measures.

How is it panic measures?

Pryce is better than Marsh & has done more in the first team to justify having that centre spot while this Gleeson Saga erupts.

I thought he should have passed to Goulding for that one, but I think you're right that Pryce would have scored. I was asked today by a mate if i'd have Pryce back? Why wouldn't we? He hardly put a step wrong all last season, I'd feel much more confident with him there than Marsh, that probably won't go down well I know. I just don't see how someone who, when he catches the ball, puts his head down and only runs straight can play at centre. Yeah he's quick and did well under the high ball a couple of times, but as a centre surely he needs to be more aware of who is around him?

I thought it was a digger or truck

Some on here would slate KP if he missed a tackle or scored a try from 3 metres out. I don't know what he needs to do to get better support, but I feel he'll be one of those players who will always have a section of fans who just don't like him.

Marsh and Goulding were our right side against Hudds at their place last year. They ripped us apart down that right side defence and scored three tries past us. That's a real challenge for the coaching staff this week. Pryce was also one of our best men that day!
Hudds are on form too, 50 past Bradford today.

Pryce has been playing rubbish for us, best to keep him down here I think!!!

Unlike many on here i have no problems with Pryce. The run-outs in London will be great for his confidence and if he could fulfill his potential he would be a fabulous asset. But i have also said that people who have known him for many years have told me that he would have much rather have been a footballer. So maybe he never will realise his potential.

he strikes me as a houghton type of player. Rugby league is just something he was relatively good at and not a game he really loves.

Are we going to get a K.P thread every time a winger misses a tackle??

personally i wouldnt have him back, hes has his chance, didnt grab it, lets move on

I wouldnt have him on the wing, i'd have him at number 3.

Yeah cos a strike rate of more than a try a game isn't taking his chance.

does he look like he wants to play?
he just looks lazy to me, if he comes back and proves me wrong then fantastic,