[urlhttp://www.wiganwarriors.com/news_full.asp?newsid=4905[/url

Not too sure if we needed to bring Darryl back.

does seem a strange move to bring DG back

With Karl Pryce not up to super league week in week out maybe and Gleesons 'injury' I think it's a good move to bring an in form Goulding back to keep Bailey out in the second row.

IMO it's more a case of Nobby not wanting to go with Sam for the rest of the season. DG returns and Phelps or Gleeson goes 6 with sam benched or rested.

Well seeing we are going to have to play Tommy at 9 and Gleeson maybe at 13 Phelps will have to fo to 6 that means we need a winger or a and DG can play both

Pryce in the starting 13 with both Goulding and Mossop played off the bench.

Seriously have i missed something in regards to Gleeson?

I actually thought he was injured. If it’s anything else could I possibly get a pm bout it?

Either way four long term injuries there added to also missing Hock means it’s all hands on deck at the moment.

Give the youngsters a go imo

I surmise this is because Hock has been removed from your salary cap thus freeing up the space to take these players back.

weird about Goulding. I didnt think we would see him in a Wigan shirt again. Especially not under Noble.

Dead right, the top and bottom of this is that we can now afford to have them back.......

Smith out for season. Looks like hes played his last game for us!

Also if i read that correctly we have washed our hands of him.

The line ‘and Wigan wish him all the best’ seemed to me like he was now gone or at least decided to take the surgery back home.

One of the biggest let downs we’ve ever signed imo was Smith. He came over a young lad having been a yp of the year in Aus and being hailed as the next big thing and he just didn’t deliver.

Puts it into perspective when you think Dobbo was available around the same time as him

Why are people mentioning Gleeson as a 13 when we have Joel, Hansen, Bailey, Flanny and Farrell who all play in the backrow week in week out?

Surely an injury is an opportunity to give a deserved shot to Flanny or Farrell.

That seems the most logical reason.

Been a total anti-climax. Had a lot of promise and delivered nothing. Can't say I'm too bothered about him going, I wasn't one of fan who rated him cos he could pass.

Very astute observation IMO. Players went out on loan at the time we signed Gleeson and I don't think it was just for the experience.

Dave

Not sure whether his injury is actually 'season ending' but I was told we're looking to get him 'paid off'.

Goulding has been going great guns for my Fantasy team at Salford as well. Gutted.

It was ridiculous some of the reasons people were supporting Tim Smith.

Glad to see the back of him.

I just hope we now see the end of IL 'risk' signings.

Smith didn't pay off
Mathers didn't pay off
Pryce -Yet to be seen if it pays off.

This is terrible news tbh. (the injuries I mean) I wonder where Smith will go from here. It's obviously not worked out for him as well as he might have hoped but has he done enough to be picked up?

As for Goulding I didn't think we would see him back but maybe he can prove his doubteds, including nobby wrong.

I'm looking forward to seeing mossop in a wigan shirt with all this experience I am hoping he has gained

He was injured and will be back this week.

Anyone saying anything else are simply trying to stir up trouble.

People were probably just testing the water.

I can understand bringing back Mossop but Goulding? Unless Gleeson's still unfit or moving to six, that would mean he's probably going to go with Goulding over Pryce, with perhaps Pryce on the bench. I see the CCSF is in 5 weeks s hopefully there's a chance that both Sean and Mike might be back in time, hopefully because we could really do with them.

We can always rely on you for a quick one liner.