only 3 games gone but r we now an average sl team???

No.

if we where average we'd be mid-table. we are currently below average

11 Posts, all of them Negative????

I smell a Rat!



Maybe this could be someone we've seen before???

If he makes comments regarding Alex's dress sense then we'll have him.

im no rat im wigan through and through and the reason there r so many negatives is because i can hardly see any posotives

Don't give up yet. It's still early days. I've seen better Wigan teams than this make equally poor starts to the season.

I'm sorry friend, but with posts like this, I suspect that you can barely see the keyboard either.

Capitals and spell-check are good, text-speak is generally regarded as bad.

In answer to your original question though - No.

We are currently a collection of good individuals who are failing to perform as a team.

On paper, we should be top 3 - Much better than average.
In reality, we are bottom 2 - Far below average.

We are only two players from being a very good team.
That's two props BTW.

I disagree, 1 prop and a positive gameplan away from being a pretty decent team.

you think we need 2 new props?

To replace who? Coley and ? As Barlow said, one prop and a gameplan would do fine.

No...it is early days..I think around about round3-4 teams get into their stride.

Must be game 4 that happens then!



PS


If we lose at Quins it may be Round 5/6 or 7!

we are very much average, to suggest we are up to the level of leeds or saints is simply ridiculous. our squad is no where near capable enough to win the league or conjour any form of challenge. we are mid-table.

centre?
FB?

mid table at best

6, 9 - the list goes on

We are a mid table side - the biggest club in the game - but in SL terms, we are mixed in with the 4th-8th placed clubs.

We have no business in the top 3 currently.

We are average along with every other team appart from Saints and Leeds, we are just a little better than afew teams but are not showing it atm.

We are a prop and a quality half back and a leader away from being a top team, also needing to get rid of afew and bring the youngsters in.

This is why a young coach who used to play for us would be ideal, they would play the young players. Faz was given his chance, he would want to do the same for our young players, along with an experienced coach he would be class.

You looked a damn sight better team when Mcllorum was on the pitch when you played us but you was blowing for tug for the last 10mins and we controlled the game easily.

Personally think you need a F/B,S/O and Props and maybe a big line breaking 2nd rower.

Oh God, has he taken to wearing dresses now !!!!!!!

Hock and Joel not enough for you

They wasnt when we did you....



Think Tomkins is suited to 13 personally but looks a superb prospect,Hock maybe more suited to come of bench against tiring teams and using his offload.