[quote="NickyKiss":2v9r4463]Yeah, I think so. If a player had charges in Feb, May and July 2024 for example, they would drop off, one by one, in Feb, May and July 2025. Looking at Byrne from Good Friday last year, if he has any sort of charge early in the season, he'll cop at least 3 matches. If he stays clean until 31st March 2025, he will have 12 points drop off his record and go down to just 3 points and then have some leeway. His 3 points will drop off around the 11th May 2025, which was the date of his second and last charge in 2024. Harry Smith is actually the biggest concern looking at the disciplinary site. He only has 1 point against him for that Yellow card on the opening night at Cas but he has 12 points for that incident at Leeds on August 10th, so he is any sort of charge away from at least a 2 match ban from the first game, right through until August 10th 2025. I don't mind it in a way with Smith. He needs to improve that silliness that crept in last year and it should concentrate his mind a little.[/quote:2v9r4463] Fenton Rogers may miss the whole season if he puts a foot wrong, it's a crazy situation when the rules are being applied retrospectively..

The RFL seem to have been thrust in to action after Sam Burgess criticised players carrying points over from 2024 and are going to look at some tweaks, before communicating the final version before the season starts.

[quote="NickyKiss":2d05gvr1]The RFL seem to have been thrust in to action after Sam Burgess criticised players carrying points over from 2024 and are going to look at some tweaks, before communicating the final version before the season starts.[/quote:2d05gvr1] Someone should make some tweaks to the RFL ... like replacing them all with people who can actually do the job.

[quote="Cruncher":37o8zati]Someone should make some tweaks to the RFL ... like replacing them all with people who can actually do the job.[/quote:37o8zati] Their response to people asking why they've not released official communication about these amendments was to just say 'we told the club's in December'. That's ok then, just ignore everyone else across the game who might want to know. It's some number being in the top brass at the RFL, especially when you decide to pay a company to help do your job. I mean, it seems like IMG have seen them coming but they're at least taking some the RFL's flak nowadays.

[quote="NickyKiss":26mdss9p]Their response to people asking why they've not released official communication about these amendments was to just say 'we told the club's in December'. That's ok then, just ignore everyone else across the game who might want to know. It's some number being in the top brass at the RFL, especially when you decide to pay a company to help do your job. I mean, it seems like IMG have seen them coming but they're at least taking some the RFL's flak nowadays.[/quote:26mdss9p] These are all good lines, and I agree with every one of them, but unfortunately when the dust settles after this latest micro-sighted cockup, and it will do because it always does - they'll still be there, earning massive paycheques for drinking free gin and pretending they are professional administrators (which at least are two things they seem to be good at).

The whole thing has been handled in such a shambolic way that, if it was a private company, you'd expect people to be losing their jobs. A month out from the start of a new season and we are talking about this?