If Myler plays, we stand no chance whatsoever.
Totally undercooked, lacking form and fitness.

Doesn't make sense really... So he's picking someone who shines in a team of crap players other than someone who shines in a team of half decent players? Surely on that basis tomkins is still the one to pick?

And if you based it on Wire_Yeds thinking, why didn't Smith pick Ratchford who has outperformed Myler at in the same squad?

Exactly. Despite all these excuses warrington fans are coming up with it's obvious myler is only in the squad because he signed for warrington. Put it this way if he signed for Wigan would he be anywhere the squad let alone the 17? It's embarrassing for the sport.

Not making excuses, i'd rather have tomkins in tbh. The logic i used was if you can play well with a poop team around you then you should be amazing with a good team around you.
For the france game im not too worried anyway but against the oz i'd rather have Sam he's a fiery little sod who won't be intimidated by crims

And how would that sit with regards to the Wales game where he was also crap?

Not only that, as has already been said, where does that leave Ratchford who consistently outplayed Myler in the same crap team?

At least you realise he shouldn't have been picked in preference to Sam. If only a certain other 'Wire' had as much honesty about him, eh?