Just remember last season, Hill was brilliant for us, when he played the whole match. But when he played a part of the match, then went off we fell apart.
We play good without Orr playing a part at all.
We play good when Orr plays the whole game.
We play poorly when Orr plays half the game, and then gets taken off.
What does everyone else think??

We wee bloody awful without Orr last week!

But brilliant without him on Friday................

Only proves that nothing is predictable apart from our unpredictability.....

I think that Orr probably has more influence over our game than Scotty Hill did.

Where were you Fri-Listy

You missed a cracker

Only got back from USA Thursday afternoon - was in Maidstone at the time, shocking jet lag.

Id have Orr over Hill any day of the week.

<splutter>

I'd have Hill over any other half back I've seen in our colours any day of the week.

I agree.

He was hopeless. Orr's three times the player Hill was.

I'd have Hill 2008 over Orr. Hill 2007 can begone from my sight.

Absolute rubbish, Hill was twice the player Orr is, especially Hill in the past.
Hill was much more creative than Orr is. Yes he threw some dodgy offloads that went to no one, the squad around him imo wassn't good enough to anticipate his movements. The amount of tries we used to score on the back of his runs and offloads are amazing. He won so many games for us.
IMO, Orr will never win as many games for us as he has.

Deary me Tim...

Have something to say Mr Dave?

Even in the twilight of his career Hill was often just too ingenious for the players around him.

Tre Cool with his latest catch:

Can you get a fish that big Dave?

That fish is better than Scott 'im so good that no-one knows where im going to throw the ball' Hill

A player is only as good as those around him. Remember: Rugby League is a team sport.

How did Melbourne cope with losing him?