Only thing I don't understand is why chose the quarters wirh the white Cross rather than the 4 quarters version. I recall at the time very few liked the cross element, including me but I still bought one. However it is a Broncos shirt & not a revamp Fulham shirt so that has to be good.

I've asked club for an ETA on shirts with sponsors so let's see what they say.
Speaking of sponsors, Seeen PLC burnt £8 million last year on an income of £2 million and with just 8 employees. That's some loss for an AI company.....literally sticking clickable ads into a YouTube video is hardly rocket science. The 8illion loss represents and increase from a 3 million loss the year before.
You Boy Films is a one man band out of Stevenage......nice spiel but not a lot of substance. Their "we work with" brag sheet doesn't transfer to their balance sheet.
I'd be stunned if either of these firms are spending a penny with us....
Dragon Soop. Hmmm....logo can be seen below SEEEN logo on the sleeve of the away shirt in the video?
Either we have a huge deal to announce or we've not got one at all like last year and will end up with a transfer hastily added at the last minute...
Hate to be wrong, but I see very little revenue if any from sponsors this year and personally I'd rather have a local garage on a 3 year deal to cover us in the 2nd tier than a blank shirt with a transfer option come July in ebbsfleet

So no major sponsor, every game live on tv.Not sure if the sky contract has anything in it, but why not contact TNT sports or discovery sports and see if they want to sponsor. the front of the shirt.A 80 minute advert every week on the oppositions network would I am sure bring in something like £100k easily, even 50k is better than nothing.

One bit of positive news, I sent pics of the away (but really home) shirt to all the former members of the DC Posse & all loved it as for most was their first Broncos shirt. Having said that, they would only buy it without sponsor logos.

They’re in luck then!

Email from seriosaboutrugbyleague.com today had a bit about the new shirt. Article ends Quote "There are still some great opportunities for businesses to be involved in our incredible journey back into Super League. For further info, please contact commercial@londonbroncosrl.com.”'" Begging for sponsors this late in the game is not a good look. I'm not sure of the legal ramifications, but it could be argued that IMG have directly impacted our ability to generate revenue by effectively relegating us back in October.

Email from seriosaboutrugbyleague.com today had a bit about the new shirt. Article ends Quote "There are still some great opportunities for businesses to be involved in our incredible journey back into Super League. For further info, please contact commercial@londonbroncosrl.com.”'" Begging for sponsors this late in the game is not a good look. I'm not sure of the legal ramifications, but it could be argued that IMG have directly impacted our ability to generate revenue by effectively relegating us back in October.

IIRC for the first three or four seasons as Harlequins RL the club did not have a front of shirt sponsor. There was the Sports Cafe top right, but nothing in the middle.

I remember one season we had a company called 'WIN' as a front of shirt sponsor, can't recall any others though.

That was our second year with Puma as HRL. Up until then, nothing.

Home shirt seems to have been confirmed without a sponsor. Still looks remarkably plain. https://www.londonbroncosrl.com/london- ... 024-season

Home shirt seems to have been confirmed without a sponsor. Still looks remarkably plain. https://www.londonbroncosrl.com/london- ... 024-season

Yep
Sports cafe were the main shirt sponsor those years with the decision made to not centralise the logo as it would have been lost in the pattern.
The point here is that we have 250,000-400,000 viewers on TV (more if were on BBC) and yet nobody wants to be on the shirt as main sponsor?
Worst case scenario, Hughes should choose a charity and give it to them for free.....but a blank black T-shirt in SL isn't going to deliver a saleable story for sponsors in 2025's 2nd tier.

Quote ="jbuzza"Home shirt seems to have been confirmed without a sponsor. Still looks remarkably plain. https://www.londonbroncosrl.com/london- ... 024-season'" Still says final item.may differ with addition of sponsors. I doubt many will order the black one until we know and I certainly will hold back on the away shirt as it has the potential to be ruined by a centre sponsor

Quote ="jbuzza"Home shirt seems to have been confirmed without a sponsor. Still looks remarkably plain. https://www.londonbroncosrl.com/london- ... 024-season'" Still says final item.may differ with addition of sponsors. I doubt many will order the black one until we know and I certainly will hold back on the away shirt as it has the potential to be ruined by a centre sponsor

I'm astonished we (still) don't have a main shirt sponsor given the amount of TV that has been promised this season. Mind you my 2024 jersey still hasn't arrived so there is hope yet!

Chelsea FC didn't have a front of shirt sponsor at the beginning of this season.

I'd hazzard a guess they might have been holding out for slightly more money than London Broncos.


Bartercard have popped up on the Cornwall shirt. Did we not get any benefit from them being on the shirt on and off for over a decade?

2 days out from the season and with official launch events over and the media coverage, including photos of club captains etc complete, we are heading into what will probably be our last shot at SL for at least 5 years with no main shirt sponsor.

This is unforgivable.

Unlike Chelsea (Thanks Curtism) or even Cronulla sharks a few years back, it's not like we are holding out for mega bucks, but to start a 27 game TELEVISED SEASON unable to flog the shirt sponsorship seems to highlight an appalling lack of commercial ability from the commercial department. Furthermore, it does "reek' of the other new "sponsors' actually not paying to be on the shirts either, given that "upgrading" sponsors to "match day sponsors" seems like all this commercial guy was capable of last year.
Whilst I don't want the club to do a Newcastle and fold only to unfold crumpled and unusable, is this the right time for Hughes to cut the umbilical cord and let us sink or swim? Income wise we must be quids in given the squad/rent can't be costing us any more than last year and SL should add at least another 13,000 paying fans to the years total income, so maybe, if we are preparing for the lower tier next year we should do so without the anchor that is Hughes involvement weighing us down? Let's face it. We're not going to get anything like the funding in 2024 ever again with the same people doing the same thing and expecting a different result, are we?

I think the company behind the Smashlings, Toikido, have come in at the 11th hour as front of shirt/ collar? sponsors. We couldn’t really have done much more during their trial run so good to see it’s paid off.

With 1 broken leg & 1 buggered knee, Smashlings sounds about right.

on this

isn't going to sell well

They're not using that logo. Just the company's name along each side of the collar.

Behold

Would be unforgivable to go into Friday's game with nothing on the shirt front. So many good causes out there if they can't or until they do flog the space.

Sweet (and phew...)
Has anyone ordered/received their shirts yet? I'm loathe to spend hundreds of dollars until I know what it's going to look like.

It might be worth approaching foreign companies as Super League have announced tv contracts around the world including America, Canada, Africa and Asia. Oh i forgot that actually means doing some legwork and contacting people, scrap that idea.