Then of course under those circumstances its a difficult one.

Take the first 3 years as Quins though, the change to the shirt was so subtle you could hardly notice, a slight change to the green on the arms and a different coloured Workplace Management badge, the third years saw a move from a black to a white collar. I guess its those sort of changes that I was more getting at

As for the St Marys sponsorship, its not on the replica shirt anyway

If I remember a 4 year deal was signed with Puma, surely this is not a licence to manufacture 8 new shirts over this time. Let each one last 2 years which means just one new shirt each year

I like this season's shirt! It has a certain 'shine' to it. It also looks alot more like an RL shirt, which I'm lead to believe was the intention. The last one didn't really differentiate itself from the RU shirt that much.

Dunno about that FA thing, I think umbro have brought out new shirts every year for the clubs they supply, deffo in the case of West Ham who've had a new home AND away for the last 3 seasons.

Don't see why the RL shirt has to change every season, unless like last we changed suppliers. Unless its in the contract to do so every year.

Not going as far as saying i liked the 2009 shirt, but for me it was the first one to show a marked difference from the RU lookalikes we'd been playing in since 2006, therefore not a bad thing as far as I'm concerned.

This year you might pick up a cheap "Nanyn" or a "Grayshon" in mint unused condition! (You might need to be on the large side though.)