Your understanding of the rules of the game is a bit like Wigans understanding of the "Salary Cap" rules.
Make em up and bend em as we go along.

Have a nice day, see you in a fortnight and have a safe journey over.

PS Give my regards to your dad and don't forget your specs.

I'd love for you to point out where I have made any of those claims.

ATEOTD your own one eyed outlook is defending what is basically a blatant late hit. I wont even bother to go into whether it was high, wide or handsome. I don't need to. My only claim is that it was late.

You have used a series of weak arguments and inaccurate observations to try and justify this and have failed spectacularly. In the end you've resorted to suggesting I've claimed this incident changed the entire game, which I have not done at any stage, and then started making claims about how much better your team apparently is. A sure sign you aren't capable of defending your POV. What with it being a load of rubbish that's not really a surprise.

Pretty embarrassing for you.

My dad died 3 years ago and I don't need specs, but thanks for the gesture. Can't wait for the game though.

I'm not embaressed at all to be honest. I'm quite comfortable with my accurate view of the incident and my opinion that it wasn't a "blatantly late hit"


I'm more than capable of defending my POV and in regards to my team the league table suggests I'm right and so does the result on Sunday.

Good comeback well done, I am well and truly put in my place!!

YAWN YAWN YAWN

Can't wait to see you on Britain's Got Talent, you should be making a fortune typing through your nether regions






Does it not get boring thinking you're right all the time

As I said, show me how I am wrong and I will accept it.

Cautioned only.

Found any of those claims I've allegedly made yet? You know, those imaginary ones.

Probably in the drawer next to the imaginary ones you're making eh!

Contact after opponent has passed ball. Also known as late.

Contact with head and neck of player.


Both impossible according to the non-embarrassed, can defend his accurate POV with the best of them, special lad from Wigan.

Even if this 'late hit' was as bad as some like to think it is, i think everyone really needs to get over it. Wigan won end of, that incident did not change the game. Some fans on here have been so over dramatic its getting embarassing.

Found any evidence to suggest I'm wrong yet??

We have, it's the drama queen from Wigan who can't let it drop.

I think he was referring to you!

You will find 15.1(b) is what he was accused of and that NO CHARGE means he is not guilty, he has been cautioned due the carelessness of the impact. "player entitled to make some contact with opponent but contact with head careless"

You mean me who has been proved right??

Are you serious?

I think he's serious! Unbelievable!

No charge does not mean not guilty.

He has been cautioned for a late high shot. Stop kicking the dog, the poor thing is goosed.

I was referring to everyone, he's not been charged so we can all move on. I cant wait for out next game now, im glad its in a few weeks time.

No he has been accused of a late high shot and has not been charged, therefore not guilty


Have youever heard of somebody being accused of GBH not being charged and being referred to as "guilty"???? thought not


NO CHARGE means he has been found innocent of the charge if he had been found guilty of the charge it would have said CHARGE

Again, you are wrong. He has been cautioned for a late high shot on Robinson. It is there in black and white on the website.

He has not been charged. If he's not been charged he can't be found not guilty, can he. He has been cautioned for a late high shot.

FACT™.

What dog have I kicked??

willing to admit you were wrong yet??

No, he has been cautioned for a careless high shot "player entitled to make some contact with opponent but contact with head careless"

as you said it is there in black and white. If it was late he would not have been allowed to make contact!