He'll get sending off sufficient and Wane will get an apology off the ref..

Thankfully not many punches get thrown to the throat...I suppose punching an unconscious man on the ground would be worse but I can't see anyone in our game being low enough to do that.

Classic. Always bringing up the past. Yet if I brought up certain Morley/Wood/Westwood incidents on here people would go nuts.

It was a high tackle, not a stiff arm, and not even really a swinging arm.

Yeah, it really was.


And which Morley incident are you going to bring up?

Do we have enough room on here for all the Morley incidents

I can't speak for anyone else but I don't go in for "defending the indefensible ". The incident I saw showed your Glorious Leader throw an arm out and hit him in the throat, but maybe I should go to Specsavers.

Maybe you should.

Btw Sinfield got a 2 match ban for headbutting Luke Dorn. Again, which is the worse offence?

What, I should defend the indefensible? Yes, I do know what you meant, you clearly saw the incident in a different way, I'm not surprised.

Keep shirking the question.

it should be a 2 match ban and a fine any thing less,well let you make your own minds up on that one

You have lost me, swinging arm to the throat,just as dangerous as a punch arguably more so. Does that answer your question?

He as got a grade c charge 2-3 don't know if he as a EGP.

Given the two players are generally in motion, I'd say a high tackle has the potential to cause much more damage than a few punches.

When Sinfield for the one time in his career lost the plot Luke Dorn did not spend the rest of the game concussed so O'Flopplins was by far the worst. How can you compare them

From what I'm reading he isn't using the EGP and will be at Red Hall, surely he can't believe he is getting away with it.

I think 11 other clubs would have gone down the EGP route knowing it was futile to contest it but ........... He has been there 31 times before and been found not guilty every time what odds a 32nd???

Maybe he is on the panel as he goes there so often .

He most definitely must be on the panel, one game ban is what he got because of his exemplary record.

Well if the panel never apply the rules he will inevitably have an exemplary record. It doesn't feel right to me but then again I'm not a Wigan supporter, I'm bias..

Looking on Twitter plenty of less biased people than us think this stinks and also makes a farce of the EGP. Rodd Studd said don't rule out an appeal just because he pleaded guilty like they did with Flower HA HA HA!!!

He's not been there 31 times before.

What are you going to make up next?

It didn't look very pleasant on SL show & i think he got off very lightly.

And your surprised he got off lightly !

He as not made anything up, 31 times been referd and not charged, only been charged once, why u gettin y about it, oh hang i forgot wigan can do no wrong.

"He has been there 31 times before" is absolutely made up as you eloquently put yourself.

And so did the RFL:
"The independent tribunal took into consideration O'Loughlin's first half dismissal, guilty plea and long professional career having not previously appeared before the disciplinary tribunal"