|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2015 | 10 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2016 | Sep 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| HI ALL
See we ve the scientist referring on Friday
the man who has just discovered that you hand is not part of the human body as proved at 21.42 on Friday night
what a shock mr thaler
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32363 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It should have been a penalty try (possible 8 pointer) as Ratchford made no attempt to tackle but used a shoulder charge.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 247 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2016 | 8 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| oh no
Fri Sep 23, 2016 11:57 am. Rogues Gallery
It should have been a penalty try (possible 8 pointer) as Ratchford made no attempt to tackle but used a shoulder charge.
It looks like the referee, touch judge ( Not linesman, they were football officials), the square in the air judge and the match review panel all disagree with you RG. It wasn't a try worth 4 points never mind a penalty try. Just take satisfaction for your win, and the poor pixel resolution on sky camera work.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5535 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I think we need two or three video challenges per team per game just like tv can manage in cricket & tennis or like i said previously let the ref make decisions for tries with no video assist. A challenge would not necessarily be against the ref's decision but also the competence of the broadcaster/video ref.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2866 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2019 | Nov 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Many of the comments here show why I think the decision should be left with the ref BUT he should have the technology available. Let the referee guide the rewind/playback, let him see it on the screen and let him make the decisions. Afterall, he is the person who knows exactly what he has a doubt over. "Can we check the grounding please?" .... you just wish that one day the video ref replies back "well it looked OK from here so what exactly do you think happened ?" (Unlikely I know as they often look at something 10-15 times and still miss it)
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 1789 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2016 | 8 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Nov 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Is it just me or was the super zoom used at Leeds last night far higher resolution than what we had at our game last week? Seemed clear as a bell for that Leigh try last night!
Conspiracy conspiracy conspiracy!
|
|
|
|
|