according to them
matty smith to wigoon
sean gleeson to hull kr
danny williams to bradford

Had already heard about the first 2, Slightly disappointed about Williams if true.

If, as reported, Widnes have offered Smith £140,000? Let him go, he's not worth that amount of cash and Widnes seem desperate. That's the sort of money we spend on players of Patten's calibre, who, in my opinion, is in a different league to Smith.

Of the three players listed, I'd like to see the club concentrate on keeping hold of Williams. Too often the club seems incapable of investing wisely in the forwards. Two props should be top priority. We complain about the teams fringe defence, but it all stems from our weekness through the middle.

Wild, Jewitt, Ashurst are the only players who have shown they are good enough on a consistant basis. McPherson, Gledhill and Anderson have shown their ability, but need stay injury free. Given the amount of changes, it looks like the club needs to make, I'd give Anderson another year, if his price is right. It's a damn shame Sidlow is weighed down by his flaws, such a good player in patches, but so flawed at the same time.

Would be really sad to see Williams & Gleeson leave. Gleeson has been great for me attacking wise his ability to offload the ball is quality needs to work on defence but I’d like to see him sign. Same with Williams he for me is better than Broughton and I honestly don’t see who will be brought in that could do a better job.

Smith would let him leave poor kicking game and defiantly not worth 140k Jesus!

[url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18282851Wigan,Saints or Widnes -on BBC site[/url

I would be surprised about Williams to Bradford with the Bulls possibly entering administration and questions about the head coach for 2013.

From the Beeb Re. Smith

[i"He inspired the Reds to a 38-34 victory over Huddersfield"[/i

Did he really?

Really couldn't give a stuff about Smith if he wants to move on... He's 90% of the time just a pivot player for me... can't see what the attraction is in the big clubs wanting to sign him.

I'll be gutted to see Gleeson and Williams leave after Salford gave them both chances to resurrect their careers.

think it's now time to get a final decision from matty and if his choice is to leave then the coaching staff should use the rest of the season to see if the A team players are good enough to play at the higher level

Can't sign/register new players currently can we? I would presume this applies to our out of contract players as well as any new signings?

Maybe cause he's playing behind a beaten pack before they take to the pitch?

When he went to Saints for the play offs he beat wire on his own that game

we can, we signed theo and owen last month on new contracts. Bradford seems an interesting choice, they are short of half a million on what they needed to find by the end of April but are still here. Lookks like they are going to pay over the odds again for players and try and get the Rugby League to bail them out.

He can be a quality player, on his day, but his day is far too infrequent and his one on one defence can be poor. He will be a loss, but not a massive one. Maybe Smith's deaprture is the reason they gave Theo a long term deal.

If Smith doesn't want to stay, put Sneyd or Fages in starting from tomorrow.

So you'd rather stay at Salford with a lower salary playing in front of an empty stadium with a cowardly pack, with nothing to play for each year with numpties running the show, i know where i'd rather be.

What cowardly pack would that be DI?

The story about not being able to sign/register players didn't emerge til a couple of weeks after Owen/Theo had already signed. Hope it's not true but the club have yet to deny it.

I'd rather keep him, but Smith would not be a massive loss. He's decent, nothing more, and I don't buy the old line about "constantly playing behind a beaten pack". I can't remember ever coming away from a game marvelling at an outstanding flash of brilliance, his taking the game by the scruff of the neck or a moment when he singlehandedly won us the game. Blakeley, for one, used to do that on a regular basis and our pack was hardly known for pulling up trees during his lengthy spell at the club.

We've moved on from losing at least 5 better half backs in the last 7 or 8 years (Robinson, Myler, Ratchford, Clinch, Dunneman), and we'll no doubt lose 5 more...

If Smith were to go I can see the club having a fairly decent sum of money for replacements next season as along with Patten, Feka and Anderson you'd think 4 of the highest paid players are going. Think Sneyd is the ready made replacement and with his goal kicking ability it would take some of the pressure of Houldsworth. Invest in the forwards as all acknowledge we need and it would give someone like Sneyd the protection he'd need to work and progress into the star we know he can become.

All this does again show the foley of waiting until the final year of a players contract to renegotiate, we should have been trying to tie him down towards the end of last season by offering him a say 5 year deal, he's a player who would have warrented that without question.

At the beginning of the Season Smith looked the real deal.
Unfortunately since then his form has dropped off and he looks a run of the mill SH.
He does not score many tries, his kicking game has gone back to the dross we have seen the last couple of years and he does not create many openings.
If Saints or Wigan want him then good luck.
We have now replacements in the wings for Smith who want to play for the club.

sat on your settee

So they're in [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18306934[ucrisis[/u[/url and yet they can make an approach to Williams?