Thoughts?

Surprised.

You CANNOT attack the head. Just because its the shoulder and not an elbow or forearm it shouldnt be ignored

Shoulder into face not intentional but deserved imo

Ridiculous and the ref has ignited the game by making a stupid decision.

Good use of the screen by the officials.

High and dangerous but NOT a red.

I completely agree with the decision and hope a shoulder to the head is now punished accordingly and consistantly
Very dangerous.

Totally justified. Contact was deliberate and to the head, and it doesn't matter whether the part of the body that made contact was the arm, leg, head, foot, fist or shoulder. I don't think Moa's a dirty player, but that challenge was dangerous.

Deserved red for me. You can use your shoulder but not into someone's face

Hit him right under the chin and his shoulder was rising all the time. Whether it was pre-meditated or not is another story. Deserved to go as did Tommy Lee last night but bottler Bentham bottled it once again.

Game's going soft. It was a great hit imo and if it happened to a Hull player I'd be saying exactly the same.

So I suppose you thought last nights decision was right too?
Moa may not have meant to do what he did, but it was an attack to the head with the shoulder and deserved a red.

Yea sure you would

, you can't attack the head in anyway shoulder or arm, sending off was the correct decision.

End thread.

There's a difference between a swinging arm and a shoulder. I'm fairly sure if the Lee incident didn't happen last night Sam Moa would have stayed on.

If there is a red for every 'attack to the head' the game would end up 5-a-side.

So what would constitute a red then?

I don't know, zero intent to foul him.

Rinaldi stepped inside and by doing so dropped his body and head to shoulder height, complete accident.

So do you think the high tackle on Sharp moments after should have seen red? After all you can't attack the head. The one on sharp was deliberate too.

That was my view of it, but then, I'm a Hull fan.

I would say a shoulder to the chin is far more dangerous than a swinging arm. There is much more weight behind a shoulder hit.

If it's high and dangerous how can it be anything but a red?

Haven't seen the incident but I don't like the way that a shoulder charge to the head is considered a great shot. It should be as illegal as any other high tackle, and if deliberate should result in a red card.

The sooner shoulder barges are outlawed the better, you are supposed to tackle a man.
High and dangerous to the head, red card not bottled unlike Bentham.

I don't think it was deserved. In fact I think Moa has got Tommy Lee's red from yesterday. I imagine referees went into their games today with last night's incident on their mind with a view to nipping biff in the bud. Cue Silverwood cacking it at the thought of "doing a Bentham" and he came up with a knee-jerk reaction.