It would appear the reds have many serious issues regarding their future

Will the Willows be accepted for another 50 years as a viable top tier ground?

are they going to improve on the pitch? myler is off...i dread to think what their points tally would have been this season without him


perhaps they deserve some rfl subsidies??

London have had them all.

Allegedly

They should just have the grace to accept the position they warrant, second tier rugby league. They have never been good enough as a club and won't get near a new ground and if they don't they shouldn't be in Super League.

I must admit i think they add nothing, and never have done really. But who would you replace them with other than the obvious widnes?

I would keep Salford and get rid of London and Celtic, replacing them with the 2 teams that meet in the NL grand final

why london?

Because they have hardly any fans, they don't own their own ground and having a successful team in SL from London has failed constantly since 1980.

plenty of teams don't own their own ground


hull fc, wigan, hull kr just to name 3

what if it suddenly becomes fashionable down oxford street and everyone jumps on the bandwagon down in central london? could bring in £millions

Maybe not.

But all of those clubs are well supported and more than capable of success

Council owned grounds offer stability in my opinion

So do training wheels on a kids push bike but that doesnt mean they can win a round of the moto GP on it does it?

It's not often you get two total bozzo's arguing , but it's funny when you do

If a club goes bust and its ground is owned by the council, it is likely they will be able to reform and quickly re-establish themselves in the same or near same standard league, as venue will likely be retained unscathed

I think you should be posting this over on the London Crusader/Broncos/Harlequins site

Just sit back and relax.