It was always going to be a mountain to climb with our best three players sat in the stand, however to make the task even harder we throw what little possession we had away & play with a man down for ten!

Congratulation to St's, they can only play what's in front of them, but they're a well drilled side oozing with talent & got the job done convincingly.

They didn't bother putting Walmsley and Thompson back on, just spread it out wide instead and turned it into easy yards. Plenty of yards from all the back line was prove of that so there was no need to go up the middle not exactly a weakness just how the game panned out.

I think Wakey struggled with the pace of the plays and the switches in direction, they gave it a good dig though when Saints tried to play the fancy sloppy stuff.

Embarrassing isn’t it. Just like ratchfords full back play when Grace made him fall over when we mullered them with absolute ease

Might have been a one off, don't forget they have the best half back (Blake Austin) the best hooker (Daryl Clark) and the best full back (Stefan Ratchford) but they can only play for 60 mins.

Not not of those players mentioned would get in our team let alone the u19s.

I would like to apologise to the Wakefield fans on behalf of the Warrington btec trolls. No need to ruin the thread because of their jealousy.

Funny thing is I’m more scared of a full strength wakey team than a full strength wolfs team

They're a parody of AS108, mimicking it's posts after every Warrington match. I'd of though you'd have rumbled what WireWireWire was up to.
Obviously not.

Watched the game and it was a gallant effort from Wakey but the woolybacks were just a class above them overall on the day.

Thought first 10 minutes of the first half and the first 15/20 of the second half were fairly even though.

It was rumbled as early as page 2, I think "Beware Shadows" cryptically described it as a fishing expedition by a few, they are like the sons of Ahab.

I really don't like giving Warrington or any other club disrespect.

As much as I don't believe in fate or luck, because the season is decided on the turn of one game it feels fool Hardy to take the mickey out of a team that on its day could turn us over.

If it was the old league system then you could be fairly comfortable saying Warrington are rubbish as 3 games and a +100 points difference is a large difference to over turn.

But in the current system regardless of league dominance you all start on 0-0 and have 80 minutes to win a season. (injuries, form, events) can all screw up a favourites seamingly simple course to victory.

I'm more than happy to wind a team up pre match but doing it season long is just tiresome and if anything just begs for an upset.

Unfortunately, with no Saints board on this site, our board seems to be a magnet for a small minority of Saints fans spouting anti Warrington bile after every game. They cannot make a sesnsible comment, and make it all about Saints when they weren't involved in the game. As a consequence, were having the majority of our threads being derailed by childish d1ck measuring contests, well away from any reasoned debate. What this unnecessary trolling is encouraging is retaliatory posts from our supporters on the VT. Every club has it's fair share of narrow minded posters, which I'm sure was a contributory factor of The Entertainers site migrating to Red Vee. I just wish there more Saints posters left on here who have the ability to make a relevant point or comment, as I can see things going in a downward spiral for the remainder of the season.

Then why is "Rubber Duckie" and "silver2" spouting an anti Saints comment on your Hull K R v Warrington thread and adding fuel to the fire.

Not saying two wrongs make a right, but the constant goading from certain individuals (and we all know who they are) will only encourage an equally negative response.

Thats true, can agree with that.

Another discussion of RL ruined by the infants.

Saints are a good team as their results show. But I did find myself wondering as I watched this match, if Saints had been down to 11 men for a period would this result have looked much different to the HKR v Wire match? I don’t think it would... pure speculation obviously.

Redvee doesn't get much input from other rl fans though. As far as I can see there is only rubber duckie and rogues gallery from other clubs that frequent that forum and both are met with hostile abuse. I can see how rd would provoke that response, but it's a bit harsh on rogues!

My experience is there are few hostile posters who just don’t understand that opposition fans may be seeking reasonable debate rather than just being wind up merchants. I mainly just go on there to see what is being discussed as there are some well informed and knowledgeable posters on there.

That bellend rubber duckie only pops up on redvee patronising us whenever we've had a poor result or when we're about to play Wire.

Was all over the site giving it large the week before we played them this season but cowardly did a bunk when we gave his side a good beating.

Years since last Challenge Cup Final

Catalans - 1
Warrington - 1
Hull - 2
Wigan - 2
Leeds - 4
HKR - 4
Castleford - 5
Huddersfield - 10
St Helens - 11
Bradford - 16
London - 20
Sheffield - 21
Widnes - 26
Halifax - 31
Featherstone - 36




Wakefield - 40

Like I said, we're abysmal in the cup. Apparently we were supposed to be up for it this year.

its to be hoped you washed your hands after you'd posted that

And yet Leeds are as far away from getting there again as Wakefield are!!

The cup is just the luck of the draw.
To be fair to Wakefield if they'd been drawn at home to Saints and had Fifita, Johnson & Tupoua fit it could have been them in the Semi against Halifax

Probably would have lost by 6 points in the last 5 mins with the usual "controversy" decision depending which side you are on.