You really are a blinkered muppet aren't you? Wellsy don't waste your time trying to have a reasonable discussion with this biased idiot. Judging by your repeated posts on this thread you seem to be one of these people who have to get the last word in don't you? Bless ya.

As for your barely threatened statement I seem to remember FC bombing a try on the right just a minute before McGuire scored at the other end. What was 18-14, should have been possibly 20-12 to Hull had Tickle converted. But hey don't let the facts get in the way of your opinions.

Blinkered? Biased? I support Harlequins



Oooh one incident, I prefer to reflect on the entire half, but hey don't let facts get in the way of your opinions.

That was after we'd scored, and pretty much the only threat you offered in the 2nd half.

You are entitled to your opinion, that is fair enough. I think Leeds bombed more chances than Hull and generally put more pressure on.

I think Hull were poor compared to the standard Leeds were at - there is no point comparing the Leeds side now to the Leeds side nearly a year ago is there?

Anyway, back to the original topic.

IMHO I thought Bailey had a right to try and get up and Radford was stopping him. That would have been a penalty anyway.

As it was the elbows were no worse than Webb does all the time. Radford should have rolled away. As it happened he got some cheap shots in. The fact that Bailey is an irritating coward doesn't make it better.

Right decision to send him off.

Would you say that the poster who typed



Is someone saying the sending off cost you the game? Because, genius, that poster was YOU.

If you're going to make a proposition try and stay consistent for a little longer than your very next post if you want to be taken seriously.

At what point did I say you were a Leeds fan? But it's pretty obvious you don't like Hull.
When Radford got sent off, I immediately thought that's it, game over Leeds are gonna romp it. More often than not if someone gets sin-binned it usually gets punished points wise being down to 12 men for 10 minutes.
But to lose by only 4 points with 12 men for SEVENTY minutes they couldn't have been that rubbish could they?

A heroic defeat but a defeat nonetheless. Take some solace in a great display if you like. We'll take the 2 points, 4th place and a second bite of the cherry in the playoffs.

Before McGuire's 2nd try, watch again mate.

Can't argue with that mate, you've typed more sense in 2 lines than that idiot Lister has done in several posts.

I'm sure you will and rightly so.
I just don't get why everyone is being so smug about scraping past a side that had 12 men of 70mins. Hardly Old Trafford form is it?

Obviously G1 is a little more subtle than I am.

Bottom line, I would rather finish 4th and have a 2nd bite in the playoffs. But IMO it's irrelevant because i think neither Leeds or Hull will win the big prize.

I see you conveniently ignored my previous question. Thought you had an answer for everything.

I assumed you were talking about Yeaman? The only other one I can think of is the Scott Donald intercept?

Can I first apologize for not seeing this post - my fault entirely.

What is blinkering me? I posted at half time over on the Hull board that I thought Hull would win as Leeds were playing very badly. This completely switched in the second half, and Hull were poor, even with 12 men. Leeds didn't play well either, bombed several chances, and didn't convert their pressure into points.

yeah, this is still funny,

you Lister are like your beloved Quins team, a poor attempt at trying to be something special


give up your anti Hull rants are well known on RL fans.
Bailey is a thug, he elbowed lee in the head several times, which is why Lee retaliated. they should both have been sin binned for 10 mins to cool down.

I have been consistent. Just because I believe it cost is the game doesn't mean it's true. For all I know, we could have been worse with him on the pitch. I don't believe we would, but it is very possible.

fancy a job as a comedian do you, you are one big JOKE !!

ANTI HULL COMMENTS come out everytime,
boring southerner

as for FC being poor, whatever happened to Quins

I think having one player short for best part of the full game is slightly less than full strength, don't you think?



If Hull had beaten Hull KR by 4 points and they had a man less for the entire game, I wouldn't be bragging too much about it. In fact, I'd be kind of embarrassed that we only just managed the win.

why are you making an argument even you dont believe to be true, opposing the argument you do believe to be true then arguing your consistency.