That would seem to be the most obvious option, wouldn't it.

As for the numpty saying the South Stand is "better than Odsal" and "only slightly worse than Headingly (sic)"

shut it WELLSY

class

The bubbles burst? What a load of cods.

Tonights game proved once again why it's the best, awesome.

great game to watch, and i say that even in defeat

wasn't a perfect game (lots of errors) but sometimes that just makes it more entertaining.

still woulden't pay to stand in that 'stand' at Craven Park though, the FC fans celebrating after the big screen had said 'no try' says it all about how poor the view is.

If it hasn't already been stated I think the extra £7 per person is to pay for the extra stewards/police to keep said fans from entering the playing area, the problem doesn't arise when other fans visit so discounts can be given.

have you just made that up?

Of course. Unless it's a rather sad post-rationalisation to appease Trading Standards.

Just like 4-5 years ago when Rovers played FC around Christmas time every year and you couldnt filll the north stand ?????

First and second diallowed try's for FC were correct but i don't believe the third was a forward pass; it was a game full of errors but i thought FC deserved something from the game

Rovers, the real great club in Hull, By By Thundersharks. The red red robin is bob bob bobbing along

For the benefit of the braying donkeys!

I thought the game was excellent, far more entertaining than watching Leeds ( mind you anything is).

It could have gone either way, but that kind of entertainment should be shown worldwide.

Why Kingston upon Hull people cannot be magnanimous after either victory or defeat is beyond me.

Its because KR fans are meth addicts.

You managed to spell a three letter word incorrectly.

Quality.

Precisely, July, warm weather.

I cannot be ar$ed if they come or not to be honest, they are entitled to spend their money how they want, just don't keep going on about 'in any kind of weather'



Like most RL fans, I follow my team to give them support, it doesn't matter if its in a nice shiny new stadium or the terraces on a cold wet night at Headingley and the other excuse about 'not giving Rovers their hard earned cash' is also bull$hit, no Rovers fan wants FC to benefit from their 'hard earned cash', but as supporters it comes down to giving the lads your unconditional support. The supporter of the previous FC club would not have bothered, they would have turned up in a hurricane, but this lot of 'newbies' are a different breed.

Pmsl!













Twice!

Would that be crystal meth, or metholated spirits?

What was the total attendance?

9,450

I love this. Rovers take 6,000+ to the KC every derby, hence the sell outs / near sell outs, whereas FC bring less to Craven Park than Warrington did... and yet the low attendance is somehow KR's fault? Love it. Loyal supporters? Wouldn't know the meaning of the words.

Did you actually read the whole thread or just bits of it ?

The majority stayed away because of the price YOUR club charged us to attend. KR fans coming to the KC get the whole North stand which seats around 4k and they pay the same as those in the opposite south stand. Every club that has visited Craven park has been charged £10 for that "stand" except one , FC

And what is the official capcity of Craven Park?

Don't know and don't care



put it this way, they have a fan base of around 8,500, so any expansion seems pointless, just rebulid the south stand, or bring it closer!

My point is, that even when Wigan have had a lean spell against Saints over the past few seasons they still bring plenty of support to KR and we do to the JJB (DW). So the attendance shocked me for the "biggest" derby in SL.

It has been £17 to get in KR and the goons still bring alot of fans, so the ticket prices shouldnt really be an argument. Anyway dont Hull KR have 80000 fans at every game?