Quote ="Psychedelic Casual"In the last ten years the following England sports teams have played the following number of games:
Cricket (not including 50 or 20 over formats) 114
Rugby Union 121
Football 114
Rugby League 47
This sport is crying out for a heavier international fixture list!'"
Are you suggesting central contracts for RL then ?
Cricket and Union give central contracts to the bulk of their International squad and although these players are allowed to return to their clubs, when there is a lull in the fixture programme, they are effectively full time players for their national team(s).
Football is the exception. However, it's is an unfair comparison due to the large number of playing nations.
We do have to work harder on establishing more League playing nations. The obvious starting points are further helping the "south seas" countries and working harder to improve France (Toulouse in SL would be a massive help) and better promoting the other home nations.
Even though The Crusaders didn't quite work, the idea was a good one.
Tapping into the Union talent pool was a good idea but, unfortunately, the lack of cash put the skids under that venture.
It's all about where the games priorities are.