Quote ="GT"
But what do you change in order to make games more meaningful? Reduce the number of teams in the playoffs and more teams are involved in dead rubbers. Reduce the number of sides in SL and you push the problem further down the chain. Make the Champions the team that finishes top and you have the dead rubber problem again. Unfortunately it seems the only thing that could make a difference is changing the mentality of the supporters, but as with most sports in this day and age I fear it has gone too far.'"
I question how much extending the playoffs to 8 teams has really changed the motivational landscape for lower clubs. Do they really think that scraping to eighth gives them a chance of winning the GF? Only Leeds have shown that a lower place finish is 'OK', but from fifth, not eighth, and even then, Leeds, with the quality in their squad would retain belief that a win from fifth was possible, regarding their lower regular season finish as something of an anamoly. Until someone wins from eighth, it'll always seem like a bit of afterthought - "oh go on, plucky loser, we'll let you have a few more games". But paradoxically, I think a lot of people, certainly me, would be very concerned about the eighth team winning in terms of the meaningfulness of the regular season.
I think top 8 is almost a lazy response to the problem of varied club ability - we sort of say " top 5 is more or less nailed on, so lets make it 8 just to let others have a go in the playoff". It should be top 5 at most, and get on with solving the real problem of uncompetitive teams.