Quote ="Chris28"TBH this is all caught up in the language. The decision being sought (eventually) is not a dispensation or a "breaking of the rule", as it is foreseen in the specific clause. If the board refuse and Dobson plays/trains/whatever, then the rule will have been broken.'"
DING! DING! DING! DING! DING!
18 bloody pages, and finally someone shows that plank from Leeds exactly how the rule might be broken, but in fact never will be.
Move along now, nothing to see here.............
'"
