Case to answer, apparently. Anyone seen the video?

Wondered why he got put on report. Biting crossed my mind although I didnt see it.

It was very blatant. Surprised it wasn't already being discussed on here.

Never saw the Howell incident, can't imagine it being too dissimilar.

4-8 matches according to the RFL, so I'll guess it's another 6 match ban.

Why would a RL player ever stoop so low as to bite an opposing player?
It's clearly a very cowardly act that deems a stiff penalty IMO
at least he's now got a new nick name of JAWS



And you lot were calling Bailey for being a dirty player?

From the most ardent Bradford fan: ban him. Deserves it.

Bit weird that with now record of foul play (that I'm aware of) in the middle of a game where he put in several entirely legal bonecrunchers, he'd do something like this. Take it the video leaves little doubt then?

Teeth marks stay in the skin for a long while even if there is no intentional bite

Try it at home

I'd heard he had Cox in his mouth.

You really are worrying me today. They'll not let you back into Ilkley if they find out about all these strange goings-on that you seem familiar with.

Usually if any doubt exists the player gets off so if he did do it he will cop a ban and in all fairness no one will complain.

The footage I saw was inconclusive but he made a movement towards the arm with his mouth, whether he actually bit him I'm not sure. Either way it was a strange thing to do.

The HKR players reaction wont help him. He pulls away quickly as if bitten

As you would in all fairness had you just been bitten.

Its a strange one. Whitehead seemed to change his mind half way through and pull away. Not that it is much of a defence mind. Didnt have him down as that kind of player.

Was Whitehead wearing a gum shield? if so i don't see how he could penetrate his arm.

Yeah he still had his gum shield in, it was weird he pulled away before he put any pressure on! think the KR player was complaining about the intent rather than being actually bitten!

what will his defence be??? he only gave cox a bit of a suck?

Didn't James Child say that the TJ was a witness to bitemarks on Cox's arm?

Didn't hear him say anything about bite marks, TJ was witness to the attempted bite, didn't look like any of the officials looked at the bite marks at all, could be wrong though!

Us folk in East Yorkshire have teeth in our bottom gums too

Didn't see the incident but I agree that if the evidence is true he should receive the same ban as Howell. Lowest offence to commit in my opinion, along with spitting.

yes-you could hear Child say it clearly

That's not the incident- it's just before that,you clearly see Jordan Cox pull his arm away,
Hopefully the panel get a clear view as it needs stamping out straight away.

Must say I'm very surprised at this

Biting is one of the worst offences in our sport, it's cowardly and disgusting and must be eradicated from the sport.... However

looking back at the replay for this it does not appear to me that the was anything in it at all, he moves his head towards cox's arm and back down again, this was in slow motion but if u watch it at full speed it just appears as if he's trying to get to his feet.

I think he's been hard done by on this one and I would imagine there will be an appeal

He moved towards the players arm to bite him, not sure how you bite in a gum shield but he fair went for it, as cameras showed. Stupid thing to do seeing as though he was playing a good game aside from this incident .

The clip everybody keeps mentioning,which sky showed wasn't the actual biting incident.
It was just before that,-you can clearly see Jordan Cox pull his arm away,