After that there needs to be more changes.

Halley
Sheriffe
Menzies
Nero
Tadulala
Sykes
Jeffries
Lynch
Godwin
Scruton
Donaldson
Whitehead
Burgess

Newton
Cook
Kopzcak
Langley

I'd start with Cook and Whitehead drop Newton and give Horton a run from the bench.

If Tadulala is fit then he comes in for Platt. Otherwise I'd keep the same team as today.

Halley
Sheriffe
Menzies
Nero
Tadulala?Platt
Sykes
Deacon
Lynch
Godwin
Scruton
Whitehead
Cook
Langley

Donaldson
Burgess
Horton
Worrincy

when is crookes back fo you

Worrincy and Deacon should be dropped imo. Bit unsure about Horton, but Godwin played for a lengthy period and didn't look to be tiring, so if needed he could just have a couple of short spells.

Out for season.

right this moment, i dont care about the team for next week. just so long as they dont embarress themselves again

There needs to be two props on the bench for impact.

Halley. Sheriffe. Menzies. Nero. Tadulala. Sykes. Jeffries. Lynch. Newton. Burgess. Langley. Cook. Donaldson. Subs: Kopczak. Scruton. Whitehead. Godwin.

Can't argue with that. Godwin should start based on today though.

Totally forgot about Jeffries!

I'd include two props provided they're capable of making an impact. I'd be tempted to start with Lynch and Kopczak then bring on Burgess and Scruton that would take us up a gear.

I'd be even more tempted to start with Scrutes and Koppy. Scrutes really gives it to them in the first quarter and then we'd go up 2 gears

if we brought Lynch and Burgess on. I'd rather see Olbison get a place over Langley next week, he was useless again.

I dont think Newton should be crucified for today, yes he had a poor game, but it's not like he preforms poor on regular occasions, i'd definatley give him chance to make amends. Godwin still on the bench for me.

Yeah Bullseye, I'd take Burgess and Scruton from the bench.

Not sure, I thought Langers made some ground today and was always busy, he was cream crackered when he came off.

I suppose, but he's not a LF. Donno or Burgess should get played at LF with Langers in SR.

The thing about Langley is that he isn't a creative player. People are looking for him to do things he just doesn't do.

We're lacking creativity in general but we won't get it from Langley. He's there to defend. We need to recruit from outside to get some creativity for next year.

He's more of a loose than Sam Burgess will ever be.

In the game v France Burgess showed people what a LF is supposed to do.

Maurice Lindsay could have played LF against France and showed people what one was meant to do.

Maybe. There was a reason why Tony Smith picked Burgess for LF for England, and not Langley.

Burgess wouldn't have played loose though if O'Loughlin didn't pull out.
The past few games Sam has played at loose should be enough for anybody to see that he's never going to be a loose. Personally, I think he lacks the mobility and ball skills.

Against a French side that would have probably lost to Batley.

Burgess is a prop end of story.

Second Row for me.

Burgess is definatly a 2nd Row/Loose. He will burn out like Stuart Fielden if he carries on at prop, plus he has too much talent to play prop.

I hate it when people say this, it does a great injustice to fantastic skillful prop forwards. Look at Barrie Mac, the fella was a unbelievably talented ball player, so was Webcke.

I think it was really unfair to put Halley on the wing this week. He's done nothing to justify moving him as he's been excellent for us.