w@nK indeed.

I don't think that, in our current situation, any deduction for Salford will mean much. If it comes out that Salford have by set out to purposely circumvent the cap then they should have the full penalty brought against them but I feel this isn't going to be the case even with the mad doctor's comments regarding the RFL

Okay so Salford get docked points and finish bottom , what next. Even if they are in the M P G they may still be in the super dooper L next season. The whole comps a bag of sheet. Come to terms with it.

That's great, did you work that out all by yourself, or did someone tell you?


You didn't notice, then? We have no need or wish to "come to terms with it", cos we're not, er, in it any more. Do keep up.

Genuine question:

Who is the bigger pratt: Dr Marwan; or Derek Beaumont?

I think they could be the same person

Let's have vote. What would we of preferred Marc Green, even though we are having a tough time on the field right now or Mrs Koukash with Merciless Ming pulling all the strings. I know who gets my vote

If they are found guilty by an independent panel wouldn't there be an argument for both London and the bulls taking legal action for lost money due to relegation if they were cheating the Salary cap in that season. I don't want another legal battle but surely it would be a question that both clubs think about. But who would you sue, Salford or the RFL.

I certainly believe if they did cheat all supporters should refuse to go to that ground as a protest. I would certainly not go in any play off game and give him my money.

Phil Clarke

Yes, that's it. We could sue for a "Dalla"s: if we win, we all walk out of the shower, still in SL, and the last 3 years never happened! It was all a bad dream!

Love it!


Er, you do know we've been potted twice for similar. Are you also advocating we don't go to Odsal?

Exactly.

Some people on here really need to get a grip. OK, so Salford may well have been "cooking the books" but they are hardly unique. We are where we are for pretty much the exact same.

People in glass houses and all that....

At the risk of being lambasted by your good self FA, he was refering to the middle eights being she!!te not SL. HTH

If so, maybe they should have clarified that then?

TBF I think Lampy was referring to the structure and that Salford could be found guilty deducted points but then start the middle 8s on zero effectively meaning they get away with it. Don't see what people are getting so worked up about.

I don't think anyone is getting "worked up" about anything? The Aardvarks' blood pressure is always far too high so that was quite a cool and composed post IMO.

I can see that somebody with limited intelligence struggling to understand, no offence to you Ed

but FA comes across as somebody what's at least half a page in front of you in that particular field, and let's face it my post was to him and I thought it might just be an error on his part which did not need any further explanation.
Sorry if I've touched a nerve and caused you any embarrassment but if I might be so bold as to offer some advice it would be simply don't jump into an adults conversation without fully understanding the simplest of posts.

You can tell when FA is vexed because he starts multi-quoting.
Any time you see the dreaded FA multi-quote, you should just run for the hills tbh

Dear me.

Being accused of having limited intelligence by a Wakefield fan is tantamount to be called a bad parent by Kate and Gerry McCann.

You are Frankie Boyle and I claim my £5 (Scottish).

We have dead flashy Australian style plastic fivers up here now Bullseye. You would like them.

Shame they do not work in supermarket self scan thingys but cool nonetheless!

Ed the reference to people with limited intelligence was a generalisation of the situation to those not up to the standard required to converse with FA, please forgive me if I gave you the impression you might fit into that list.
Btw your analogy is proof of that, I think were done here

You still here? I thought you would be back on the Wakefield board exchanging high sixes with the rest of them on there because you "done me, good and proper?"

But I converse with you; how much lower could the bar be set?

You don't converse with me at all I simply make allowances for you, both you and eddie taggart are out of your depth here, having said that both you and him would be out of your depth in a car park puddle

I'm off to get the coal in now far more mentally challenging

Awww, poor semi-literate dear!

Mind and come back when you have found your missing chromosome.