Can you call yourself an interested party unless you have actually formally approached the administrators?
So a Supporter's Trust may be interested but I doubt very much they have got anywhere near putting anything together, they have not even had a meeting yet have they?

So I would be very disappointed if that is counted as one of the four interested parties.

Richard Lamb? Again? He is always interested, but doe he ever actually do anything outrageous like make an offer?

I know he has supposedly put a bid in before but who is Richard Lamp and is he worth any £££££

The dream team option of

Caisley
Hood
Khan
Green

I'd guess the potential bidders may be Green, Lawn, Lamb and Caisley. There's no supporters bid, there won't be either. A supporters run club would have to be done post liquidation and be a start from scratch in the lowest tier. That too is highly unlikely given the lack of appetite amongst fans to give up their free time and money voluntarily.

I'd hope for anyone but Green since he's lost the trust of everyone now.

Has something to do with Rotherham Titans. Not a big money man. Wouldn't be able to pay off all the debt.

Would any of them be able to pay the debts off?

Richard Lamb is always interested until the RFL say "Show us the money".

The Wigan arrogance never fails to amaze!

No fit and proper owner test needed there then

Get your name in the T&A buy claiming you want to buy the club. The T&A will lap it up and put a photo of you in a pose and print your plans and dreams regardless of having the money.

Dreams and promises usually include,

Wembley of the North.
Putting a roof on the terrace.
Super League in 2 years.
Being open and honest with the fans.
Stability and living within ones means.
Safe hands.

Buying odsal lock stock and barrel.
These people are toxic you really need to do all you can to keep these people away from the club

Why are people suggesting that Caisley is one of interested people?

People seem to be missing the elephant. That is, WHAT IS the "debt"?

First, according to Green, there is little or no debt re HMRC - if I understood the garbled 'reporting' in the T&A they claim it's 350K, he claims it was 135K, and we've paid 100K.

I am assuming for now that HMRC are correct, as if there was a real dispute then the company couldn't be wound up, but the argument about whatever issue it was would have to be decided by a court, and HMRC clearly aren't being taken to Court; nor did Green have any confidence that the insolvency hearing would buy the "genuine dispute" argument again.

But, and here's the point, if there was a genuine issue as to the 350K, and as Green claims the admin is just to ensure a winding up can't immediately happen, then why on earth would he, a new bidder or anyone pay a "debt" that was actually no such thin, but a "genuinely disputed amount"?

So even if there were an interested bidder with extremely deep pockets (far fetched enough already for me); they would also need to have a penchant for throwing away 350K on disputed amounts which they neither personally owe nor actually need pay!

Now, HMRC will never in a million years accept a deal on the alleged money, its either pay in full or get a court decision in your favour, so how any administration goes depends entirely on who has the majority vote for any proposed deal.

To recap, we need someone who
a) has around a spare million to lose immediately
b) who will agree to operate on half RFL money for 2 years
c) with a 12 point deduction and
d) seemingly a completely hopeless business cashflow position, if you judge by the current figures, late wages payments, late company accounts and a loss of 800K or so and an apparently insolvent position of the company even a year ago.

I just can't work out why there isn't a big queue forming.

Administration bingo.

Plus, he kinda started the downward spiral that we are stuck in. Maybe some people feel that he owes us something?

Four interested parties to date; Mark Lawn, Richard Lamb, CRS consortium & Brook-Crispin. A lot of supporters don't want Marc Green again.

Brook-Crispin is CEO and owner of Seabrook crisps

Well that would take care of the bar snacks...

There is the first problem, can anyone believe a word from this man's mouth anymore? A man who by all accounts allowed the club to disclose the news of admin via the media before even having the courtesy to discuss it with players or staff. I'm more likely to believe the Sun newspaper than I am Marc Green at present.

Pay HMRC in bags of Prawn Cocktail...you struggle to get 'em down south.

Provident? Whoever our fairy godfather is in Provident who continues to convince the board we are a good sponsorship option, perhaps he could try to convince the CEO to just buy us. It may be a stretch of his influence, but they can only say no....

Good advertisment for Seabrook

Seabrook Stadium
Seabrook Stand
Straight cut Shirt (Home)
Crinkle cut Shirt (Away)
Lattice cut Shirt (Alternative)

No chance!! The tea lady insists on Walkers being served at all times

Imagine the commercial tie-ups of the past - a bag of Salt and Vagana anyone?

(Coat fetched).

Crinkle cut our cloth accordingly