Would be a good cover signing I reckon. We definitely need some more competition in the halves too.

As long as you could get him banned from every pub in the area he'd be ok, but you really need to be looking at getting better quality than Tommy Lee.

I'm not suggesting he come in as first choice, purely as a backup player to create some competition in a place we are lacking. Rather him than bloody Thorman anyway.

You`re not forgetting Hall and L`Estrange are you?

I agree. I think Tommy Lee is a clever little player and has good utility value. He wont be able to demand the dollars because he hasn't lived up on his early potential and developed into the class player that was expected. However, he has a good rugby brain on him.

Good brain, Versatile and Realativley cheap would make the ideal candidate for cover in my books.

I would have to disagree....

And is $hite.

I agree with you. He's picks the wrong option the majority of the time. To slow with ball in hand plus he isn't the most professional of players.

Of course he is, now that he's left FC.

Erm no.

He didn't leave FC, FC released him and the reason he was released was because he wasn't good enough and was unprofessional.

Regardless of whether it was his decision or Hull's, he's still left. Pedantic much?

The point I was making was that 99% of players that leave a club are immediately considered rubbish by 99% of the fans of that team.

I think you'll find that most Hull fans would agree that Lee isn't good enough and never has been.

Did you see the bit where I said "99%"? I'd consider that "most". I appreciate you clarifying my point though.

So back to my original point, he's $hite and you'd do well not to sign him. Motu Tony would be a better option for utility.

The reason he's struggled is simply because Hull FC fans put too much pressure on him as a youngster you expected him to be a world-beater.

heard a rumour chris bridge is coming back and stuart reardon

I'd like to see Bulls adopt a policy of bringing back their former youth players, within reason.

dont they play pretty much the same position whats the point in both of them signing

No.

Reardon is a fullback who can cover centre or wing.
Bridge is a Halfback who can cover centre or wing.

Their primary positions are very different.

stu reardon has got a lot to prove he will be a really good signing for anyone now cause they will get him cheap and he will want to make his mark after being out fof a while

I thought Reardon was basically a done deal?

Thorman says he doesn't know where he'll be next year but it won't be Bradford in the League Express today.

Thank god for that.

Phew...

Lets rejoice